PWA 1967

On the Auction subject Heritage have opened an office in London

We may aswell all have a go and i dont even know whats wrong with it

Looking at DNW for tomorrow and lot 1145 is not a F65 Lots to look at from this morning until it finishes though.

Just to the right of your log in name Frank.....Help & Contact.

A Weirdo Said he got me mixed up with someone else

On the point you raised above Stu Yesterday looking at my ebay i had received feedback from a coin i bought last week along the lines of........."Buyer never contacted me and would of got refund left negative feedback F%^%in idiot." Made me laugh as i hadnt even left any feedback I mailed him and told him to take it off of which again he went on with himself. Anyway the point i am making is i phoned ebay who accessed my account and looked at the messages etc ,deleted the feedback and sent me a copy of the mail they then sent him. The thing is they dont tolerate the abuse and language some pricks send people..... the seller then sent a message to apologise. All good fun Pete.

He does try though like the 1862/1 thats maybe a little expensive

You wont be able to remove toning (it is what it is ) without making the coin look worse as a proof and will not benefit from being dipped IMO. Unless someone else has some other idea

A serious question ......Why do you think it would be worth something or more than 1p as you went to the trouble to post ?.

The only book is the latest Freeman that has the updates of some recent ones including the two you mention. The biggest finds are the ones nobody knows about and people perhaps are looking for

I dont think so Terry (i cant see any ) although its sometimes hard to check as it depends as to what they may describe it as Just the 1860 there are over eighty varieties.

Good find and hat off Was only talking about these on Saturday to a mate and the english grading company now slabbed three.

There is also a doubled 9 1897 variety.

If anyone is reading this The one listed without a picture on the Mark Rasmussen site is a F166........ i know as returned it and although he agreed he has not changed the description.

Nothing exciting a 1908 F164...... i only bought it as you dont see many of them. Or maybe its just that i have a coin buying addiction

They must of been busy yesterday Mike as one i bought arrived today

I assume you have looked under a microscope Terry is it not just a double struck colon ?

All you need to do Declan is put the pictures of the fake (copy his) next to a real one and you will see the differences from there the only other difference on all the years is obviously the date in the fake bun pennies Alarm bells should ring on 1864,69,71 and 1875H in high grade that are all over ebay.

Hat Off He made no mention at all about the 1871 being a novelty or replica and had 5 bids from 5 different bidders he would of sold it if it wasnt for you.

Yes.......

One of my favourite sellers has listed an 1871 Penny Pisses me off as he knows its Fake.

Is it not just a die clash ?.

The power of the forum soon sold after being put on here Will be interesting to see if the flaw shows on any others of the same F66 1874H as that was a decent grade.

I have just noticed this thread and have one also. As the thread is a few years old wondered if the numbers have increased alot ?.