Lee_GVI Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 https://www.royalmint.com/our-coins/ranges/historic-coins/victoria-and-the-victorian-era/victoria-gothic-crown-1847/ I did not expect this coin to appear on the Royal Mint website. It's still probably overpriced like the majority of their stuff though. Quote
ozjohn Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 My Spink CofE 2016 catalogs an 1847 Gothic crown at EF GBP 3000. I guess it's overpriced but still a nice coins with a few minor edge knocks. Quote
Paulus Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 I bet the one you get isn't the one in the pics Quote
azda Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) They are doing the draw tonight live on YT for the 1819 Sovereign. Link here Edited July 12, 2019 by azda Quote
azda Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 6 hours ago, Lee_GVI said: https://www.royalmint.com/our-coins/ranges/historic-coins/victoria-and-the-victorian-era/victoria-gothic-crown-1847/ I did not expect this coin to appear on the Royal Mint website. It's still probably overpriced like the majority of their stuff though. They have teamed up with sovereign rarities, somehow something doesn’t feel right about the RM becoming a mint and coin dealer at the same time, this cuts out the middleman. Quote
Colin88 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Surprisingly for the RM this doesn’t seem too far off the right price .. nice coin. But I agree , the relationship between them and Sovereign rareties doesn’t sit right at all Quote
oldcopper Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 There's observable wear on the hair and lions, and it may be artificially toned and/or rubbed in front of the Queen's face. So it's not perfect and £5K seems quite a high price. It's a bit of a cop out for the RM not to even assign a grade if they're expecting someone to cough up 5K. Quote
Lee_GVI Posted July 12, 2019 Author Posted July 12, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, azda said: They have teamed up with sovereign rarities, somehow something doesn’t feel right about the RM becoming a mint and coin dealer at the same time, this cuts out the middleman. They did not cut out the middleman they become the middleman themselves, a very expensive one as well. Edited July 12, 2019 by Lee_GVI Quote
azda Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 Just now, Lee_GVI said: They did not cut out the middleman they become the middleman themselves, a very expensive one as well. That is what i’m referring to, this is the obvious reason they bought into sovereign rarities. Strangling the collector for even more money. SR are also expensive 1 Quote
Colin88 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 SR and RM ( who really until this link up are just a marketing company ) are both at the top end of expensive .. so combined it will be doubly expensive ... 2 Quote
brg5658 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 On the Gothic Crown, why so many edge knocks? I'd find a nicer one than that for that kind of money. JMO. Quote
Sword Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 "and it remains one of the most beautiful and rarest coins in the world." Many collectors would consider that statement a misrepresentation. 5 hours ago, Colin88 said: SR and RM ( who really until this link up are just a marketing company ) are both at the top end of expensive .. so combined it will be doubly expensive ... "Piedfort" commission 🙂 Quote
Peckris 2 Posted July 12, 2019 Posted July 12, 2019 29 minutes ago, rpeddie said: Higher or lower grade? AU55 Interesting - the example shown on the RM website appears to be Heritage LOT #31238. Quote
Peter Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 The RM didn't team up with SR......but Marleybob. 3 Quote
Diaconis Posted July 13, 2019 Posted July 13, 2019 I added one to basket and the RM will add a Peter Rabbit BU 50p free of charge. Don’t all rush at once. 2 Quote
copper123 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 Anyone think its a conflict of interest when a company that makes coins also makes money from selling them ! Quote
Colin88 Posted July 14, 2019 Posted July 14, 2019 Not really a conflict of interest .. it’s just that the 2 most expensive coin companies have teamed up together .. although personally I always referred to the RM as a marketing company not a coin company. I also have to exclude Westminster, London , Harrington and Byrne and Coincraft who are also on the strong side of pricing but must have a customer base happy to pay as they are still going strong. So who’s to say who’s right or wrong particularly if it ultimately gives pleasure to the buyer? Quote
brg5658 Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 On 7/14/2019 at 5:03 AM, copper123 said: Anyone think its a conflict of interest when a company that makes coins also makes money from selling them ! Huh? Doesn't every business that makes things also make money from selling those things? Isn't that the definition of a business? Provide a service (or item) and get paid for it? If they didn't make money, why would they continue to make things? 🤔 2 Quote
VickySilver Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 Would it bother you if the US Mint were to begin trading in the classics, buying and selling in competition with other dealers? I guess we could make all the National Mints participate in the primary and secondary markets, manipulate it as they please with the backing of their governments. I would rather them stick to their own business of minting coins, and go ahead and make their monies from that enterprise. 2 Quote
Diaconis Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 Diversification in readiness for a cashless society. They will have some good stock to peddle. Quote
Peckris 2 Posted July 15, 2019 Posted July 15, 2019 On 14 July 2019 at 11:32 AM, Colin88 said: So who’s to say who’s right or wrong particularly if it ultimately gives pleasure to the buyer? Pleasure to the buyer may be followed at some unspecified point by huge disappointment when what they thought was also an investment produces a big loss. So I would suggest that "rip off" is wrong. Quote
brg5658 Posted July 17, 2019 Posted July 17, 2019 On 7/15/2019 at 2:52 PM, VickySilver said: Would it bother you if the US Mint were to begin trading in the classics, buying and selling in competition with other dealers? I guess we could make all the National Mints participate in the primary and secondary markets, manipulate it as they please with the backing of their governments. I would rather them stick to their own business of minting coins, and go ahead and make their monies from that enterprise. Why would it bother me? No one is being forced to buy this garbage at inflated prices. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.