SWANNY Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 I will open a new post to get it out of here , I,m sure people have had enough of my bitching 1 Quote
jaggy Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 2 hours ago, PWA 1967 said: Always listen and two sides to every story...........Is that the truth with regards the court case Its been going on long enough and feel the truth should be talked about Actually ... three sides. What he said, what she said and what actually happened. 1 Quote
PWA 1967 Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 6 minutes ago, jaggy said: Actually ... three sides. What he said, what she said and what actually happened. I can stand on my own two feet.....Who is SHE ?. I would support anyone if i think they have done nothing wrong. Quote
PWA 1967 Posted September 21, 2016 Posted September 21, 2016 47 minutes ago, SWANNY said: I will open a new post to get it out of here , I,m sure people have had enough of my bitching Sure your right and good for you to put an end to it and the truth Quote
Sword Posted September 22, 2016 Posted September 22, 2016 Let's change the subject and post a few nice coins. Unfortunately, I don't have anything remotely exciting left to post. Just a few very common coins. 1 Quote
Nick Posted September 23, 2016 Posted September 23, 2016 Don't think I've ever seen a colourfully toned Churchill Crown before. Quote
crow1 Posted September 23, 2016 Posted September 23, 2016 No Nick I hadn't. This one is slabbed and graded at ms65. Makes an ugly coin slightly more attractive to the eye. Quote
crow1 Posted September 23, 2016 Posted September 23, 2016 This is an 1825 Farthing - Type 2 - incuse midribs, peck listed as very scarce. Does anyone know much about this variety Quote
azda Posted September 23, 2016 Posted September 23, 2016 49 minutes ago, crow1 said: This is an 1825 Farthing - Type 2 - incuse midribs, peck listed as very scarce. Does anyone know much about this variety Silver? Quote
Sleepy Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 (edited) Is it me or does the G in GEOR look off line, or is that normal for this coin. It's a beaut' by the way. The 1817 is similar but not as pronounced as the 1818. Edited September 26, 2016 by Sleepy Spelling mistake Quote
Nick Posted September 26, 2016 Posted September 26, 2016 The G is slightly smaller and lower. Variations in the letters and numbers are not unusual for this era of coin. Quote
Paulus Posted September 27, 2016 Author Posted September 27, 2016 Just to ring the changes, an 1897 Diamond Jubilee Medal 1 Quote
Nick Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 Lovely toning, especially on the 1893 6d. Shame the plastic of the slab on the 1911 3d makes the obverse rim look messy. It also obscures the beads, which variety is it? Quote
Paddy Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 Not much of my stuff is good enough to show much toning, but I pulled out these 3 that look OK: Quote
Nonmortuus Posted October 4, 2016 Posted October 4, 2016 1 hour ago, Nick said: Lovely toning, especially on the 1893 6d. Shame the plastic of the slab on the 1911 3d makes the obverse rim look messy. It also obscures the beads, which variety is it? The type on the slab is S3.G5.1911.01 - CGS 82. I am at work so cant actually get to the coin today Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.