You mention........IF..........you had one slabbed.
Well the other thing to remember Jon is quite alot get rejected.
I dont mean the coin you pictured just something to bear in mind.
You need to really double check anything you have not just for grade but weather the coin may have faults.
I dont want to appear negative but would not like you to send any (i am sure you wont) and incur costs for any with a problem
Sorry i cant put the link up.
One on the list 1898 although scarce seems expensive at £1,950.00 be interesting if someone buys that for such a small difference
I have logged on hoping someone had some kind of answer .
Some ideas are better than none.
Hope you find an answer that you are happy with Matt as think if it were mine would start doing my head in
Just thought i would bring this up Colin.
You recently sent a F9 for slabbing and came back as a normal one ?.
Must be a reason for you after these comments to use them again.
Its nothing to do with me but you new from experience before you sent it ?.
I would keep that Matt and perhaps send to the Royal mint .
If nobody can be sure its definately interesting and unusual.
Were matrix/dies made bigger for any reason. ......such as a trial strike for a new die .
I know 1937 were the same but must of been replaced at some point.
I am not having its squashed and think its genuine.
Maybe i am completely wrong
I keep looking at this and cant see how its possibly been squashed ,everything seems spot on .
The rim / teeth and detail surely would not be as clear.
The reverse being double struck also makes me think