Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,393

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    250

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. PWA 1967
    I should of read Daves earlier post So its really for people who will be sending quite a few . Then as you slab i.e. 5 they knock it off . Anybody who wants to send just a couple may have to go through an agent/someone else.
  2. PWA 1967
    Sorry Jaggy your post was not showing when i replied Thank you .
  3. PWA 1967
    I am still confused ,so i have to pay £499 to grade a coin...........are you sure as keep reading that on here ? £99 to use and access the site is correct as i have paid. I am freindly with everyone
  4. PWA 1967
    Well i am strange and love it Peter. Can you /someone explain the £499 as maybe its confusing me ?.
  5. PWA 1967
    Hi Stephen and welcome If you have not got them it wont have to matter I am sure there will be someone ,perhaps on here who can give you an up to date written price for your insurer.
  6. PWA 1967
    I am 100% sure your right dave and agree with everything you say .
  7. PWA 1967
    Its more to do with being ethical. I dont like what some sellers do as much as anyone else but to put someones mobile with derogatory comments does not seem right. Think the numbers especially the mobile could of been pasted over. Unfortunately we live in a world surrounded by some weird people and on a public/open forum it only needs one to read it. Only my opinion....atleast you did not put my number up If you think its ok that is up to you as your post.
  8. PWA 1967
    You miss the point Dave people search for things on the internet on there own accord. Telephone numbers may not be shown unless at the descretion of the owner.
  9. PWA 1967
    World ending post........ Think i need to get out and go for a walk but not with a board round my neck shouting
  10. PWA 1967
    Not the banknotes Matt.
  11. PWA 1967
    I remember a block of about a hundred 10/ notes being sold on ebay a few years ago. They are scarcer in large groups as obviously banks gave out larger denominations. The buyer relisted them not long after and i felt really happy as i got them for a lot less and at a cheap price. I paid straight away but the day after he refunded my money and sent me an apology as why putting them in the envelope he had knocked a cup of tea on them........ Pete.
  12. PWA 1967
    Wouldnt matter if there were problems or the WORLD ended he wouldnt of sold it at a loss.
  13. PWA 1967
    Started the bidding at £1 with no reserve.............Wind your neck in. Sold for £218 .......Stretch your condom. Wouldnt even have the patience to watch them
  14. PWA 1967
    Thats really what i mean Matt they can only list it as they see it and they are varieties however you look at it
  15. PWA 1967
    Not sure about create there own although i can only talk about pennies. Sure they can also only say what is there or they see. I did send one in this batch that has been listed as a new variety for them a 1920 penny. Although the difference was obvious and a relatively low grade they i assume have to list it as different. I have never given details on a form ,so cant really comment on that.
  16. PWA 1967
    In fairness Matt the graders at cgs are spot on. Occasionally mistakes are made with TPGS but can be rectified quite easily and everyone makes them. Last year i sent over twenty copper penny varieties in one batch, mainly Bramah or not listed. I didnt write down any information as to what i thought /new they were and just let CGS grade them. Although some were rejected(Happens with copper) they spotted everyone. IMO no other TPGS would of spent the time looking at them or in some instances known the variety even existed Pete.
  17. PWA 1967
    Yes Matt.
  18. PWA 1967
    Just received this back from CGS was graded 82.
  19. PWA 1967
    Not got a clue Matt as i wouldnt buy them in the first place and have never sent one. If it was an error though i assume it would be graded as normal if damage from the mint and just listed with all the other errors.
  20. PWA 1967
    Well after going on about the spot the coin was rejected for Field Damage Will look at the coin when i receive it back as by getting coins rejected i learn more than the ones ok. That is one of the reasons i have sent them to cgs ,not just for the grade but the condition. Fortunately i sent another 1918 that was ok and graded 82 so happy with that one . Pete.
  21. PWA 1967
  22. PWA 1967
    Not the nicest looking penny but one i will always keep. Its the actual coin that was used to illustrate OBV 10 in the Michael freeman book "The victorian bronze penny ".
  23. PWA 1967
    Dont do that Peter........i have done five week tomorrow without a mouthfull
  24. PWA 1967
    Think it might be easier to just PHONE them Scott. When i had a problem a while ago they answered straight away ,they were in Ireland and sorted it out .
  25. PWA 1967
    No Terry i seem to remember something on another thread and checking the few i had and all were normal.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test