Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,413

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    254

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. PWA 1967
    Well i wont be queing ,especially that long
  2. PWA 1967
    Sorry should of said yes its not right your picture is conclusive richard.
  3. PWA 1967
  4. PWA 1967
    How much are they Matt ?.
  5. PWA 1967
    Easy done Matt i am always doing that
  6. PWA 1967
    Were has Prax gone. What is it ,bugging me now
  7. PWA 1967
    Only glanced and just assumed......... with the overdate it was F111. Well spotted Richard
  8. PWA 1967
    Is that in a slab Prax with the variety not mentioned ?.
  9. PWA 1967
    Thats quality Prax. Its a F111 2 over 1 Matt
  10. PWA 1967
    I did say it was a wide open question Rob
  11. PWA 1967
    Unique then yes we have know choice. Think i might be getting to fussy sometimes. I have a Few pennies that are rare F8,F41,Three plumes ETC but minor faults and when i look at them dont get the same satisfaction as one BU even if its a common date. Just makes me think sometimes........Quality/Rare.... think the answer is sometimes better to have one with a fault rather than not have one at all
  12. PWA 1967
    I assume that one is rare Rob ? Therefore is there not much if anything better ?.
  13. PWA 1967
    Yes Gary its a tricky question some i think we just accept the fact we will never get one perfect ,so unless its really horrible just buy what we can. It just makes me think if i sometimes would sooner leave a gap or have one lower grade. Anyway time you got escorted to your rubber room......Good night Only Joking Pete
  14. PWA 1967
    Yes i realised Jerry five minutes later I thought there must of been an obvious mistake.
  15. PWA 1967
    Just looking again think they are describing another coin maybe.
  16. PWA 1967
    Maybe i didnt explain myself properly Matt. By an error i meant in the listing the coin is not close ,especially the reverse to being UNC and lustrous
  17. PWA 1967
    Lot 2360 UNC and lustre is obviously an error
  18. PWA 1967
    Sorry Matt. Just spelling it out for Jac (Gary)with a crayon but says he will reply later
  19. PWA 1967
    For the lunatics of the forum ....Wafer biscuits and vimto will be served in ten minutes. Happy hour medication will be round on a trolley soon. Can we get back to sensible answers
  20. PWA 1967
    This is a wide open question but more related to scarcer coins as with common ones the answer would be obvious. If a coin was scarce /rare and one was higher grade but had problems verd,cleaned,corrosion etc. Would you buy that one or for a similar price , lesser grade but problem free. I only buy pennies but the question relates to any coin. Pete.
  21. PWA 1967
    Your full of surprises Chingford
  22. PWA 1967
    How an earth did you spot that Prax. Hat off to you ,you have a lot more patience than me
  23. PWA 1967
    Good question and be interested myself on some opinions
  24. PWA 1967
    Well atleast you got a reply. Maybe i was a bit to nice and used the correct ettiquate . Is that the right word............ ?. What i really said was........................
  25. PWA 1967
    You found me one yet Jon.......
×
×
  • Create New...
Test