Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
  • Posts

    5,526
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    284

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. Yes Gary its a tricky question some i think we just accept the fact we will never get one perfect ,so unless its really horrible just buy what we can. It just makes me think if i sometimes would sooner leave a gap or have one lower grade. Anyway time you got escorted to your rubber room......Good night Only Joking Pete
  2. Yes i realised Jerry five minutes later I thought there must of been an obvious mistake.
  3. Just looking again think they are describing another coin maybe.
  4. Maybe i didnt explain myself properly Matt. By an error i meant in the listing the coin is not close ,especially the reverse to being UNC and lustrous
  5. Lot 2360 UNC and lustre is obviously an error
  6. Sorry Matt. Just spelling it out for Jac (Gary)with a crayon but says he will reply later
  7. For the lunatics of the forum ....Wafer biscuits and vimto will be served in ten minutes. Happy hour medication will be round on a trolley soon. Can we get back to sensible answers
  8. This is a wide open question but more related to scarcer coins as with common ones the answer would be obvious. If a coin was scarce /rare and one was higher grade but had problems verd,cleaned,corrosion etc. Would you buy that one or for a similar price , lesser grade but problem free. I only buy pennies but the question relates to any coin. Pete.
  9. Your full of surprises Chingford
  10. How an earth did you spot that Prax. Hat off to you ,you have a lot more patience than me
  11. Good question and be interested myself on some opinions
  12. Well atleast you got a reply. Maybe i was a bit to nice and used the correct ettiquate . Is that the right word............ ?. What i really said was........................
  13. You found me one yet Jon.......
  14. Think you will find if he has any sense he has gone...........
  15. Just sending him a message. Funny how he is so brave and hides his address the %%%%%%'''''@@@@@'Prick. I am happy to look at his camera
  16. IS THAT WHAT HE SAID TO YOU MATT......... ?.
  17. Bob.....wind your neck in.......Shows signs of being a nice coin but
  18. Buy from someone reputable jon. Dont know about the others but the threepence is only proof
  19. On with it . Put a post on your begging thread............. Whats this rugby you mention on your profile and live in the midlands ...was that a typo ......thats really daft unless you follow that posh game . Be lucky Jon only joking and PM me on your wants.....Just so i can say i dont have them RUOK4AFO2 .......loon
  20. Good answer....... LOL
  21. Your getting a bit picky now Jon How things change from buying............RANG TANG
  22. The second one is a real flaw rather than a dot,however in a different position than the normal dot as you said. Prax have you seen any of the flaws on other 1897 dates ,such as the normal one. If you have forty DOT ones it no wonder people are stuggling to find them
  23. Which is why i said Swanny its an opinion ,i have sent over a hundred pennies and will send a few more this week
  24. Forget finest known.........we all Know it means nothing What i meant john is CGS have graded to date FOUR different types /varieties of 1920 Half crowns. Some of the others are graded a lot higher and would assume a lot nicer ....i would hope so . Weather you would use CGS or not is your choice Is yours just the standard one ,if there is such a thing as i doubt many other TPG notice different types. Although i maybe/probably .......... wrong I dont want to get involved and just giving an opinion,however can i ask how many you have sent them ? If the answer is none then to say they are rubbish might be a little unfair. Pete.
  25. Its CGS ......Variety 4.......... Swanny. I dont have a clue about them but assume this is scarcer than the other 1920 Half crowns ?. Doesnt look the most attractive reverse
×
×
  • Create New...