Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,369

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    245

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. PWA 1967
    Sorry Brian i meant the N but maybe your right and it is the light
  2. PWA 1967
    The waves merge Brian on the one on the left look at the wave on the right side of the ex it has no gap. The N of penny also appears to be to Gap rather than tooth.
  3. PWA 1967
    I would of bought the first one as single.......but having doubts now Sorry Brian just noticed you had posted above the picture as well as below.
  4. PWA 1967
    Thanks Terry although i am now confused. Is picture three the same coin you have been good enough to just photograph. I have been looking at the waves for months and would of bought the third picture as being a single ex.
  5. PWA 1967
    The third one looked single to me
  6. PWA 1967
    Look forward to seeing it finished Brian,sure it will be spot on
  7. PWA 1967
    Hi and welcome
  8. PWA 1967
  9. PWA 1967
    Are these indicators for a 1922 Matt ,i just look at the trident first ?.
  10. PWA 1967
    Hat off ,thats quality That sounds horrible Peter ....Dipped in HP sauce
  11. PWA 1967
    Well spotted Brian and unlucky. Unfortunately you can be pretty much gauranteed someone else will spot them
  12. PWA 1967
    Its ok Mike must be you
  13. PWA 1967
    In fairness Gary he does say some money will go to charity
  14. PWA 1967
    As i am starting to get depressed and absolutely sick to death of negative comments . Feel free to post anything negative about TPGS here. By keeping it here i dont have to read it all the time as its starting to get boring. So fire away and keep yourselves amused. Go on ozjohn i know you want to get started and have a go...........
  15. PWA 1967
    If you go onto Michael coins site it may explain the reasons as why its hard to find a nice one.
  16. PWA 1967
    Wind your neck in........
  17. PWA 1967
    I should of read Daves earlier post So its really for people who will be sending quite a few . Then as you slab i.e. 5 they knock it off . Anybody who wants to send just a couple may have to go through an agent/someone else.
  18. PWA 1967
    Sorry Jaggy your post was not showing when i replied Thank you .
  19. PWA 1967
    I am still confused ,so i have to pay £499 to grade a coin...........are you sure as keep reading that on here ? £99 to use and access the site is correct as i have paid. I am freindly with everyone
  20. PWA 1967
    Well i am strange and love it Peter. Can you /someone explain the £499 as maybe its confusing me ?.
  21. PWA 1967
    Hi Stephen and welcome If you have not got them it wont have to matter I am sure there will be someone ,perhaps on here who can give you an up to date written price for your insurer.
  22. PWA 1967
    I am 100% sure your right dave and agree with everything you say .
  23. PWA 1967
    Its more to do with being ethical. I dont like what some sellers do as much as anyone else but to put someones mobile with derogatory comments does not seem right. Think the numbers especially the mobile could of been pasted over. Unfortunately we live in a world surrounded by some weird people and on a public/open forum it only needs one to read it. Only my opinion....atleast you did not put my number up If you think its ok that is up to you as your post.
  24. PWA 1967
    You miss the point Dave people search for things on the internet on there own accord. Telephone numbers may not be shown unless at the descretion of the owner.
  25. PWA 1967
    World ending post........ Think i need to get out and go for a walk but not with a board round my neck shouting
×
×
  • Create New...
Test