Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

davidrj

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    1,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by davidrj

  1. Just checked mine, Aa - gap, Ca - touch, will look in my reserve collection junk box to see if I have any other 1889s to check David
  2. Got here by the Forum tag on the main Predecimal site - "all activity" & "unread Content" are giving error messages
  3. Always amazed at the quality of strike on ancient Greek stuff, keep meaning to buy a cheap one as an example, but lack of knowledge makes me wary of buying a fake
  4. Not a date spacing, but rather a die fill and/or die wear. an 166 penny Upping the contrast shows a very faint 8 No great value but fun to spot and add to the collection, and no less significant than a filled arm of an E in my view
  5. Is there a link, can't see one on the Colin Cooke site?
  6. Though the attempt may well be made, the recipients are always elderly. My late Mum was sadly demented when she received the Royal Maundy, we didn't even know she had been selected till after the event, she had no recollection of it, we found the coins and documents much later when she went into care, scattered around the house. Although she may not to our knowledge have attempted to spend her Maundy coins, she did attempt to pay a bill with old £1 premium bond certificates
  7. It was well worth the gamble, given the premium for 1860 ONFs, which I suspect all are from a filled die, rather than surface corrosion like this poor 1861 If you don't look, you wont find the cherries. I've found 1863 open 3, 1903 open 3, gouby X 1911 (x3), 1875 obverse dot, etc, over the years all for average circulated prices. I've also bought a load of crap from Ebay pictures which looked promising
  8. There's one not listed by Gouby, wide date 1895, still looking for a BP1901Aa
  9. £2.46 plus 99p postage, there's this month's budget blown!
  10. Here's the set my Mum got from HRH in 2004, full sets of each denomination, plus 2 extra 4ps
  11. This looked interesting on the Ebay picture an ONF on an 1861 penny, the bottom leg of the E is there on examination, wonder if a better one exists somewhere
  12. Thanks, here's both sides Bought a few years ago, vendor listed it as a 1915 without noting the variety. Sadly scans of shiny coins never come out as they look in hand. the notched tooth is not as pronounced as of the 1916, so possibly die damage that progressed. There are references to recessed ears without the damaged tooth, but can't ever remember seeing a picture of one. This exercise has reminded me to upgrade my standard 1915 sometime
  13. If you hold the coin to view from the edge, the recessed ear variety shows a distinct concavity rather than the normal convex bust. here are my pennies - top 1915 normal and recessed, 1916 below normal and recessed. The "Recess" is best seen in the area behind the ear lobe. Far easier to spot in photos of worn toned examples
  14. Thanks for that Gary, best article on threepences I've seen, may even think about getting some, they seem relatively cheap
  15. It came today, poor thing has had a tough life - surface corrosion, most of which has been helpfully removed with Brasso Definiely a Freeman 1, Gouby 1860 D, so fills a gap. Not bad for £8.73 plus £10 postage, the rest of the lot (mostly Brassoed) went straight into the bin except for this one A very worn example of the 1909 Ndot - so two gaps filled I'm a happy bunny paying far less than my actual bid David
  16. Just bought a job lot of vickie bronze, gambling this is an F1 - Link. Looks like raised lines on shield, but been fooled by eBay pictures before
  17. You'll be fine with anything listed as greater than 99.5% purity - that will be the minimum specification, and wont leave any residue. AR grade - 100% pure for analytical purposes is unlikely to be listed on eBay and is way over the top for our usage
  18. Type descriptions NB type numbers are not the same as coin photo numbers Far too late to try and work a matrix out, not convinced so far David
  19. Best I can do with rocks
  20. Helmets & plumes
  21. Here are the remaining coins' dates for comparison, I've not yet matched these up with the reported types I'll make a similar montage of the plumes and rocks later
  22. So here's coins 1 & 5 from Pete's pictures, corresponding to types 3 & 4
  23. That's as far as I've got so far, will report my findings, if any, tomorrow David
  24. Me too, please David
  25. Interesting. Looks like we have a clear progression of die damage in our combined examples
×
×
  • Create New...