Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

davidrj

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    1,740
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Everything posted by davidrj

  1. I wonder what would happen if someone actually used them to pay a court fee. Who would then reimburse ther court or other recipient?
  2. http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-3390519/I-buy-Royal-Mint-commemorative-coins-bulk-credit-card-gain-airmiles-cash-bank-s-refusing-accept-them.html
  3. And a Happy New Year to all from me too! ?
  4. Thanks Brian, a Merry Xmas to you and all on this great forum David
  5. I tried signing in using Facebook, got an error message saying davidrj was in use by another user
  6. I had problem inserting a link, ending up just pasting the URL which seemed to work. Can't find a button to review what I've written before I post
  7. My New Year resolution is to take a more active interest in halfpennies! I've ordered Mal's CD plus I found that the Apr/May/July 2004 issues of Coin News with Iain Dracott's articles are still available here - http://www.tokenpublishing.com/backissues.asp?pid=2
  8. Looks great on my Win10 machine, not tried it on the Ipad yet
  9. Agreed, all my new purchases get a degrease with an acetone soaked cotton bud
  10. Discounting proofs and stuff from modern mint sealed bags, all coins have been handled by somebody, I've never had someone give me change using cotton gloves or handling every individual coin by the edge! Just serendipidy that some coins develop a fingerprint or carbon spots as they age, there's a lot to be said for nice even toning on bronze rather than chasing lustre
  11. Nice pictures, the ones in Freeman are awful. How do we order your CD please?
  12. I think I make out Henricus and civitasd???????, short cross penny
  13. Having spent an hour studying the seller's pics, I think it's a bog standard, but interesting F39/BP1862C The obverse looked exciting due to the gap between the B and Victoria's head - there's a missing serif on the B. The obverse looks odd because there is just a trace of the linear circle below the date - this is normally well struck on these
  14. Thoughts on this 1862 I've just bought (seller's pics) + Interesting obverse, not sure which until in hand, and possibly halfpenny date or is it because the linear circle is totally missing from the exergue???
  15. I know I've shown this one before. My Triple F (sadly holed, but made it a very cheap Ebay pickup) is the ultimate Friday afternoon penny, legend disintegrating on both obverse and reverse. As well as the triple F, the second T of Britt is broken, the reverse has a broken E in ONE (?L over E) plus a raised dot between the E & N of PENNY similar to Gouby BP 1860 Le
  16. Doh! Senility setting in I can't see any difference other than sea level in either your examples, or Colin's on his site - probably both have same number of beads. My eyes are straining on my worn 1897 farthings to see a difference, the dark finish doesn't help - looks like these need upgrading But thanks Bob!
  17. We recently discussed the 1897 High Tide penny and agreed the best pointer was P to a gap for the high tide as the actual sea level can be difficult to make out on circulated examples. Out of curiosity I decided to dig out my 1897 halfpennies to see if there was a similar indicator The P again is a good marker, but here the high tide has P to a bead Anybody got the farthing pair in decent condition to check?
  18. The "normal" 8 over a bead (not listed by Gouby) appears to be scarcer
  19. This looks a tad optimistic, as folk know I like my penny varieties - but £545 for an EF 1898??. The wider date variants of OH pennies are scarce but not rare, fun to seek & find, but not worth that sort of premium in my view
  20. The 1882 cupronickel Jamaica penny is also catalogued as having a no H variant, but I've not seen a picture of a convincing one, except the exceedingly rare proof
  21. Something like this?
  22. Happy birthday Bob, have a good one!
  23. Looking at Colin's farthing site, I'm thinking - large 8 over normal 8 and 5 over 3
  24. I've never really bothered with farthings, they were out of circulation by the time I started collecting, but over the years I've accumulated some and thought it might be nice to complete a simple date set (most are pretty dire ex circulation) So help with this 1865 please The 8 looks fatter than the descriptions of fat 8 for 1865, is this an 8 over 8?? also something under the 5?
×
×
  • Create New...
Test