alfnail Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago This one, on an F16, has always intrigued me. Ghosting of Victoria's face can be seen (as it often does) above Britannia's left knee, but there is also something strange going on with the border teeth. The series of pictures at the bottom show an overlay picture of border teeth, from the same coin, which I have made gradually transparent from 0% to 100% as go from left to right hand side. This shows that the marks through Britannia's knees are clearly from border teeth. I bought this coin at Heritage in 2013 (MS63 Slabbed), and it took me a long time to find another F16 like this, to prove that it must have occurred during the minting process.......rather than the coin being hit with something post-minting. I will show the pictures of that other coin immediately below, as this picture uses up my 500Kb allowance!! 3 Quote
absence of uniformity Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 17 hours ago, terrysoldpennies said: This is just about the most extreme example I have come across !!! An 1862 penny Note the half circle on Victoria's back , its the shield from the reverse side . The extra ribbons are created from the folds in Britannia's. dress Thanks ! Interesting coin. Quote
absence of uniformity Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 10 hours ago, PWA 1967 said: 10 hours ago, alfnail said: This one, on an F16, has always intrigued me. Ghosting of Victoria's face can be seen (as it often does) above Britannia's left knee, but there is also something strange going on with the border teeth. The series of pictures at the bottom show an overlay picture of border teeth, from the same coin, which I have made gradually transparent from 0% to 100% as go from left to right hand side. This shows that the marks through Britannia's knees are clearly from border teeth. I bought this coin at Heritage in 2013 (MS63 Slabbed), and it took me a long time to find another F16 like this, to prove that it must have occurred during the minting process.......rather than the coin being hit with something post-minting. I will show the pictures of that other coin immediately below, as this picture uses up my 500Kb allowance!! How do you think the edge of the die clashed almost central? Are the two dies not on a fixed axis? Quote
mick1271 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago My most extreme die clash .Apologies, not a penny (1696 Halfpenny) . Quote
Martinminerva Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Spectacular, but not a die clash. This has been completely struck twice and rotated in the dies between striking. Quote
mick1271 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, Martinminerva said: Spectacular, but not a die clash. This has been completely struck twice and rotated in the dies between striking. Yes, wrong words used lol. double struck .I'm sure this type is noted in Peck , so not a one off. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.