Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

being honest pennies really don't interest me, these have been hanging around just in case something has been missed......?

 

P1190042.JPG

Posted
2 hours ago, PWA 1967 said:

Your 1898 is the Bisect 8 which are quite scarce.

ah... ok that's promising, I will keep anything that is scarce....although over 30 odd years ago I did have Pennies checked out that were dismissed... they seem to be making a come back.. I did move them on and perused hammered and others..... many thanks for the updates.  👍

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Hi all, 

As I can't seem to post pics anymore, I've posted a link to a coin I was hoping one or two of you might have an opinion on. I haven't seen corrosion like this on pennies of this grade, and I was wondering if anyone knew what it was. I appreciate that there is no financial value in it, but I've been looking for one where the die crack looks like thunder hitting the water for a while (don't ask). 

Thanks in advance

https://www.easyliveauction.com/catalogue/lot/69a10054d43fb3e51d0599b2e3f4531a/0af8d24542e81eb9357e7ef448a6646f/general-auction-including-vintage-comics-lego-jewelle-lot-116/

Posted
3 hours ago, dmw2602 said:

Hi all, 

As I can't seem to post pics anymore, I've posted a link to a coin I was hoping one or two of you might have an opinion on. I haven't seen corrosion like this on pennies of this grade, and I was wondering if anyone knew what it was. I appreciate that there is no financial value in it, but I've been looking for one where the die crack looks like thunder hitting the water for a while (don't ask). 

Are you talking about Britannia's leg? The pictures are pretty poor, but I can't see this as corrosion - depending upon whether it's incuse or raised (the jury's out...) then it's either a planchet flaw causing delamination, or perhaps something like grease finding  its way onto the die.

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for taking a look, really appreciate it. I had been looking for similar corrosion examples and hadn't been able to find any. 

Dean

Posted

Not corrosion, but deposits (grease and general filth) caused by storage in PVC or similar coin album/pockets. Often this is removeable and in this instance the deposits look very minor so should be easily removed with a bit of judicious cleaning/wiping.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Martinminerva said:

Not corrosion, but deposits (grease and general filth) caused by storage in PVC or similar coin album/pockets. Often this is removeable and in this instance the deposits look very minor so should be easily removed with a bit of judicious cleaning/wiping.

Thanks ☺️ 

Posted
6 hours ago, Martinminerva said:

Not corrosion, but deposits (grease and general filth) caused by storage in PVC or similar coin album/pockets. Often this is removeable and in this instance the deposits look very minor so should be easily removed with a bit of judicious cleaning/wiping.

Agree- dab, don’t rub, with cotton wool and acetone.

Jerry

  • Like 1
Posted

Looks like it has delamination to me as well

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, SilverAge3 said:

Looks like it has delamination to me as well

That’s slightly more concerning, not sure it’s worth the money it’s likely to go for if that’s the case 

Posted

I really don’t see any hint of delamination, just a die flaw and the adherent plastic residue. It really is a very decent coin.

Jerry

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

Hi, 

Trying to upload a picture again of a potential V over A on an 1866, has anyone come across that before? May just be a die issue I suppose 🤷🏻‍♂️

Edited by dmw2602
Posted
7 minutes ago, dmw2602 said:

Hi, 

Trying to upload a picture again of a potential V over A on an 1866, has anyone come across that before? May just be a die issue I suppose 🤷🏻‍♂️

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, dmw2602 said:

Probably the A was reinforced using a V punch after the die became worn/filled. The original crossbar is still visible, so either letter would do. Alternatively the inverted V was punched in first, the error noted and then punched a second time using the right punch. Given the original design was engraved on a larger diameter face than the diameter of a penny and then reduced, the first would be more likely, as faulty engraving is more obvious prior to reduction of diameter, and in any case you would expect to see it on all dies made from that obverse.

  • Like 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Rob said:

Probably the A was reinforced using a V punch after the die became worn/filled. The original crossbar is still visible, so either letter would do. Alternatively the inverted V was punched in first, the error noted and then punched a second time using the right punch. Given the original design was engraved on a larger diameter face than the diameter of a penny and then reduced, the first would be more likely, as faulty engraving is more obvious prior to reduction of diameter, and in any case you would expect to see it on all dies made from that obverse.

Thanks Rob, never sure if it makes them more or less collectible but enjoyable nonetheless the less.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 8/17/2025 at 10:10 AM, dmw2602 said:

Guess there is only one way to find out 😬

Just arrived, looks and feels like a plasticky deposit on the coin, I’m now too scared to remove it 😂 

Posted
45 minutes ago, dmw2602 said:

Just arrived, looks and feels like a plasticky deposit on the coin, I’m now too scared to remove it 😂 

Just soak it in acetone, won’t do any harm.

Jerry

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test