Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, jelida said:

I was hoping someone would ask that. Both of mine are straight, I think.

Jerry

I checked 6 coins that I have, they are all straight!

 

Posted
11 hours ago, secret santa said:

Could you post a photo of the wavy one please.

top one is my straight one . bottom is the wavy one .It looks wavy with a loupe , but magnified more ,it has a narrower top part and it looks like the wavy part is caused by the number being more chamfered at the bottom .20200727102034.jpg.910379f7dc2dc18849e240a4d264118d.jpg20200727100707.jpg.6b296272e4f6016960632e94ed2ff92c.jpg

Posted
On 7/24/2020 at 9:13 AM, secret santa said:

Any idea of the ratio of 1856 PT small and large dates, Ian ?

Ok, I have done this now Richard. It actually wasn't as easy as I thought it would be, but I'm pleased that you asked me for this information because I was a little surprised at the results. I had always thought that there were definitely more of the 'Large Numeral' type than the 'Small Numeral' type, but it turns out they were pretty close. I spent about 3 hours zooming in on all the images, and then double checked I had sorted correctly, Any that I was unsure about I did not include in the figures; some ebay pictures are not great!

Anyway, 138 over 5 years split as follows:-  21 Could Not Tell / 55 Small Numerals / 62 Large Numerals.

Hope that's useful for some members.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, secret santa said:

Anyone else got a wavy 2 ? I'd like to see more examples.

You got my one from earlier in this thread?

 

Posted

I've got 6 stacked up- all so similar- maybe there is one that has the base slightly incuse, but one is much sharper and pointed like Terry's above, and there are different widths, and some with the 2 leaning to the right...that one of Terry's leans to the left....all tiny changes, nothing major.

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Paddy said:

You got my one from earlier in this thread?

 

....and quite apart from that, it's actually a very nice coin with a lot of eye appeal.....

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm wondering if this is actually some sort of optical illusion arising from other features of the 2 - when I hold something over the rest of the 2 on the one's touted as possible wavy line examples above, the base of the 2 appears dead straight. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, secret santa said:

Yes, I'm not yet convinced.

Nor me. Without more evidence I'd have to conclude that this is a case of someone seeing what they want to see, or making something out of nothing.

  • Like 1
Posted

It does smack of  a slightly mis-aligned 2 over 2...

  • Like 1
Posted

LOL, that is my take on many "types" - when is enough clear variance enough to make it a type? IMO many of the "dot" varietals are somewhat in the category of this one.

Posted

Well this one just gave me a jump! Sorting through an old dealer's box of random coins marked at 50p each (I bought the box of 100+ coins for £5) I was stopped in my tracks by this one. Obviously a fake, but not bad as they go and should give some good banter in the market!

 

1933 D 1-horz Red.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
38 minutes ago, Paddy said:

Well this one just gave me a jump! Sorting through an old dealer's box of random coins marked at 50p each (I bought the box of 100+ coins for £5) I was stopped in my tracks by this one. Obviously a fake, but not bad as they go and should give some good banter in the market!

 

1933 D 1-horz Red.jpg

The obverse is very real looking.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, 1949threepence said:

The obverse is very real looking.

I don't think it's legit though, that 9 on the reverse looks iffy. :unsure:

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, 1949threepence said:

The obverse is very real looking.

It IS real. It's an altered date, but a very nice example. :)

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

It IS real. It's an altered date, but a very nice example. :)

I know Chris. I was being a bit tongue in cheek. 

But yes, you're right, it is a very good example. Quite convincing.

Posted
On 7/28/2020 at 8:22 AM, blakeyboy said:

It does smack of  a slightly mis-aligned 2 over 2...

AardHawk made a posting Apr 2008 in which he drew attention to a Sept 1976 Coin Monthly article, "Further Varieties of the 1902 Penny" by A R Alexander and A M Lisk. Whilst the article does not specifically mention "wavy 2s",  it does go into some depth regarding Shape of 2 and pointings, suggesting at least 13 varieties. Worth a look and a consideration I think. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, secret santa said:

Anyone got a copy ?

Yes yes. I've photographed all three pages as best I can, but copying pages is not the easiest task in the world. So apologies for their lack of perfection. They are readable though. Can't see much about a wavy 2, but the article is very interesting and useful.

 

September 1976 1.jpg

September 1976 2.jpg

September 1976 3.jpg

Posted
4 hours ago, Cliff said:

AardHawk made a posting Apr 2008 in which he drew attention to a Sept 1976 Coin Monthly article, "Further Varieties of the 1902 Penny" by A R Alexander and A M Lisk. Whilst the article does not specifically mention "wavy 2s",  it does go into some depth regarding Shape of 2 and pointings, suggesting at least 13 varieties. Worth a look and a consideration I think. 

That's gone the same way as the even earlier article pointing out many "varieties" of 1907 penny based on the tail of the 7! Now (deservedly) vanished without trace.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...