Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Super coin Jac, not spotted one of those yet.

Jerry

Posted (edited)

And a cracking price too! ?

Jerry

Edited by jelida
Posted

Pete's penny

1857_1d_01_cgs_uin_19251_pwa.png

Been mentioned and would like to ask before i put the coin away.

Apart from the belly button its a P.T. and the die clash .The feature to the left of the shield and the belly button should not be there.

Can anyone see other features on the reverse of this penny ?.

Thanks pete.

Posted

Pete,

The usual feature for the ground level to the left hand side of the shield is a triangular feature on the PT reverse, on the OT reverse it is flatter, similar to this coin,

this however has probably been distorted by the obvious fault, not a die clash in my opinion, nothing on the Obverse die corresponds to this feature in shape, size

or position, if something had fallen and attached to the die the feature would be incuse not raised.

The 'belly button' is more apparent on OT reverses

post-709-0-82655000-1437942955_thumb.jpg

post-709-0-02478400-1437943061_thumb.jpg

Posted

Does not seem to be much happening on the forum recently.

One that is toned which normally i would keep away from as its really dark and the photo not the best.

IMO is a nice even tone and a nice strike.

1861 F22 4+D and again c.g.s. 4231

Pete.

Posted (edited)

Pete's 1861 Penny. In the early days CGS pics weren't too good (they are not brilliant even now!). You can see it's a lovely coin though!

1861_1d_01_cgs_82_uin_4231_pwa_1967.png

Edited by Paulus
Posted

Thanks paul the coin was graded 82 and quite nice in hand.

I sent 22 last time and although was happy with the grades the photos were terrible.

It makes it harder to resell some as buyers want the uin and in the process of having a lot of them photographed and wish i had done so before slabbing

Pete.

Posted

One of the ones i have is finest known and a good grade.

Its got good lustre and looks nice.

1892 and cgs 33386.

Its stopped me sending anymore as the pictures look almost black and white.

Wasnt happy in general and sure they could take better pictures ,considering its part of the service they provide.

Pete.

Posted

I have sent 2 coins back to them in the past that were over-exposed, they re-slabbed and re-photographed them foc - much better but they need to realise that the pics are a very important part of the package.

I saw their set-up when I visited them last year. It was (and probably still is) an Olympus compact on a fixed structure, with a single source of artificial light from a desk lamp type source, at an angle

Posted (edited)

Same pics with the brightness and contrast adjusted a little (something CGS should have got right in the first place, but still I suspect not doing the coin justice)

1892_1d_02_cgs_uin_33386_pwa.png

Edited by Paulus
Posted

No advertising but Brandon (Brg?) who puts his tokens up here is a pro in coin pics.

Just thought if you want the best.

Posted

No advertising but Brandon (Brg?) who puts his tokens up here is a pro in coin pics.

Just thought if you want the best.

Couldn't agree more Peter

Posted

People like this I would travel for a workshop....and pay well.

Posted

Due to circumstance my free time until next Monday will be on coins

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test