PCGS were obviously proving a point in paying out that sortof money but now changing their policy what sort of point are they now proving. As Stewie says, give it 10-20 years amd tears might start flowing when things start happening to the coin inside the slab. Time will tell
PCGS eye appeal has got SFA to do with MY or an actual buyers eye appeal, what a stupid assesment to bring into a grading system. Basing a small part of a grade On their choice if it appeals to THEM or not is crazy
My current scratched coin was graded Fine in the Grant Francis (1920) and Lockett (1956) sales and 'almost VF' when sold by Mark Rasmussen in 2004... .. the earlier one .. Poor(ish) .. Unless you compared it to the Eddy VI shilling in the current Spink, in which case it might also make Fine! This was graded as VF by Glens in 1974 or 76 and again by Spink in their 2013 sale, its better than VF and i've upped it half a grade to GVF
... and this is UNC apparently. http://www.londoncoins.co.uk/?searchlot=1995&searchtype=2&page=CatalogueLooks like they have some new graders at CGS, from the blind school.
They are far from consistent in their grading standards. I quite liked the attached coin in their sale, described as: 1839 No W.W. Plain edge Proof, Reverse upright, ESC 1284 nFDC with hints of green and gold toning Failed to mention the edge knock at 11 oclock though
We were just discussing the 1841 penny on another thread, comparing your CCGB price against spink and Tony Claytons site in UNC, yours seems a bit low, both have it at £500, your price £200
Pete's 1841 penny: Its interesting to see the price Difference in Spink and the new CCGB book for this coin compared to what CGS are saying, but i thought CGS were a GRADING company, so where does their valuation come from. In UNC SPINK has £500 and CCGB £200 compared to a Grading companies £600
Oh that thumbprint on the REV Is it me or does the sea seem To change under the lighthouse and looks different under the shield etc? Its like there's a cutout under the lighthouse