Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

scott

Coin Hoarder
  • Posts

    3,059
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by scott

  1. only right this is put in here.
  2. I would expect to pay around £1.50 and a bag of chips.. everyone else? what they said
  3. there are a lot of things ebay could do better best one is the category tick boxes... would be a useful feature if it would let you tick multiple boxes so you can broaden the search to 2-3 areas at once
  4. yes but 1 example each of 5 dies is unrealistic. the rarity should be more common, we have 6 different examples here, anything with that sort of rarity is usually one one single die
  5. i checked it when i got it, for a good while. it has no dot. i posted those ones because the dot isn't in a set position, on those, by a good noticeable margin
  6. if there are 5 dies then there should be far more then just 5 and I have one above as well, (2nd one on this page), there should be many tens, if not over 100 examples.
  7. are they? oh hold on look what i found
  8. that's the problem with this date, the stops are all over the place.
  9. I dont appear to have one of these... got almost every other kind of 1699
  10. scott

    Coin of Nero

    there were fakes of roman coins made through the ages, even during the period. i got this Otho in a bulk buy, which contained late 18th century coins for example
  11. few decent reverse die identifiers there too.
  12. yea... trying on that.. people keep outbidding me on the good stuff or interesting stuff >.>
  13. yea, i keep looking for them as well.
  14. yes I did see all that, but the lower bar makes no sense as part of an R
  15. I have variates that are not listed anywhere i would say its a B due to the length of the line under the B itself.
  16. I have found my 1926 ME in a bucket of bargains as well.. same with one of the rarer 1860's. always looking for those open 3's 1897 dots..... they never turn up.
  17. the wear itself isn't that bad... its more the die.
  18. no, i was more interested in the grade, and how weak the design is compared to the letters, plus the N nearly touching the arm.
  19. that was you was it... i was after that, and btw... I think it is 1697. I pulled out way before, to me its just poor details with letters recut. I have stumbled across this site. http://www.farthingshalfpennyerrors.com/ I myself have stumbled across a halfpenny, 1696.... with farthing N's.. which isn't on there, but a 1695 is so I need access to this as well
  20. how have these recent poor examples of minting got past this trial?
  21. its polish the price are in Zloty which coin collectors should know instantly
×
×
  • Create New...
Test