Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Peckris 2

Coin Hoarder
  • Posts

    3,463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    163

Everything posted by Peckris 2

  1. Oh yes, though I haven't read any for years. My favourite was the guy who fitted a very large powerful rocket to the top of his car. Yes, it achieved incredible speed though a sandstone bluff brought EVERYTHING to a sudden end.
  2. That's L for Leica not Lumix .. so probably not cheap.
  3. This was the very first image that came up on google, so unless a coincidence, I'd say not rare:
  4. Disgraceful. 4 over 5? Yes, if I own a 1959 penny or a 1968 halfcrown...
  5. To be fair, looking at the resale pictures (which are much better than the original seller's), he got it for a very decent price. Though his selling price is a tad optimistic for a coin that - despite lustre - is barely VF! ... possibly not even that.
  6. I assume all those 'desig's are American? They are the only collectors who seem even remotely interested whether a coin is 'red' (by which they mean yellow/orange of course), 'red/brown', or 'brown'.
  7. can you decipher those "desig"s? I infer that PF stands for 'proof' but what the hell is the rest of it?
  8. Feedback of 90% says it all really.
  9. that looks as though it COULD be a 3/2?
  10. is that the very rare 'lighthouse on lighthouse' variety? 😆
  11. I saw that. I don't smell a rat, I smell a dead heffalump...
  12. Possibly you meant it IS an error? But not a fake.
  13. VIP proof? (Very Improbable Price)
  14. Presumably surgical spirit - being clear - doesn't have any dye problem?
  15. All been fine here, on my ancient version of Firefox.
  16. It's not entirely 'cached' - yes, that's part of the reason, but it's mainlyt down to the fact that your browser is running the site a bit "behind". As you say, refreshing the page should resolve things, but having said that I've never had a problem with Noonans where the video shows separately from the lot information and two appear to be in sync.
  17. Return it, get a refund.
  18. my thought is that it's a striking error at the Mint (misstrike) ... but if there's only the one, it's not likely to command a premium and wouldn't be considered a 'variety' as such.
  19. I know! Gobsmacked is an understatement of how I feel..
  20. I'd go for a grade of AUNC on that reverse - it may in fact be UNC but the 'lustre wear' together with the fact that it's a slightly weaker strike than the obverse would make me downgrade it a little.
  21. It also just "looks" wrong, on an intuitive level.
  22. wonder if the buyer has bounced it yet?
  23. Interesting that the market was featured on tonight's BBC Spotlight
×
×
  • Create New...
Test