Possively scathing! I have heard other negative things about the new Spink but you have summed up some important ones. I hope you don't do a review for my book! To defend Spink a little, they did have a staff change probably right at the wrong moment (due to the extra effort involved for the colour). I too have noticed lots of £75 priced VF early Victoria sovereigns, which with gold at about £78 per bullion coin, that is plainly not accurate! I had a 1951 Error crown in the past, so that does indeed exist. I spoke to Gouby last year and I think he considered the bun obverses too small and not able to do the various varieties justice, so that might be why they were removed altogher, even though it does seem a strange thing to do.