Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would grade it as EF , while there is little wear it is noticeable and the obverse has slight problems as well .

Was the graders name mutly (Always dreaming!)

  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, copper123 said:

I would grade it as EF , while there is little wear it is noticeable and the obverse has slight problems as well .

Was the graders name mutly (Always dreaming!)

Maybe bit more harsh, gVF to me, anyway, no where near AU.

Posted
10 hours ago, Bruce said:

Maybe bit more harsh, gVF to me, anyway, no where near AU.

I'd grade as EF/gVF. Despite the dirt patches, the obverse detail is EF.

Reverse about gVF.

  • Like 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, 1949threepence said:

I'd grade as EF/gVF. Despite the dirt patches, the obverse detail is EF.

Reverse about gVF.

I agree.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, Bruce said:

Maybe bit more harsh, gVF to me, anyway, no where near AU.

There is an  massive gulf between gvf and AU  I wonder if these gradeing companies employ children and threaten them with a slipper if they dont do as they say

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, copper123 said:

There is an  massive gulf between gvf and AU  I wonder if these gradeing companies employ children and threaten them with a slipper if they dont do as they say

That's how I run my workshop.

My accountant has managed to arrange for me to get tax relief on the slippers!

  • Haha 2
Posted
3 hours ago, blakeyboy said:

That's how I run my workshop.

My accountant has managed to arrange for me to get tax relief on the slippers!

Yes Blakey I have a picture of you with your understudy

mutt.jpg

  • Haha 2
Posted
8 hours ago, copper123 said:

There is an  massive gulf between gvf and AU  I wonder if these gradeing companies employ children and threaten them with a slipper if they dont do as they say

unfortunately, that is the American system for you - everything is "AU" right down to GVF :(

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

unfortunately, that is the American system for you - everything is "AU" right down to GVF :(

Their grading standards seem much looser than ours.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, 1949threepence said:

Their grading standards seem much looser than ours.

Undoubtedly yes, and they like everything in a small plastic box

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...
Posted

Time to show some recent acquisitions, I have had a couple of bargains in the last couple of weeks.

Firstly a nice 1898 'last 8 bisects' from the last Midland coin fair, unrecognised and £35.

1898 F149  8 bisects (5) rev.JPG

1898 F149 8 bisects (5) obv.JPG

  • Like 7
Posted

And a 1875 'cannonball' from an online dealer, £11 plus £2.50 postage.

1875 F82 Cannonball (4) rev.JPG

1875 F82 Cannonball (4) obv.JPG

  • Like 9
Posted (edited)

one of the newly discovered 1889 'missing serifs', £6 on Ebay. I have looked at many 1889's, seems scarce. Now I just need an upgrade....

Jerry

1889 F127 missing serifs rev.JPG

1889 F127 missing serifs obv.JPG

Edited by jelida
  • Like 3
Posted

And I had looked at this specimen at £50 in a dealers tray at the Midland Coin Fair many times over the last year or two, but left it thinking it was an F763 (I have several); but when it dropped to £17.50 I thought it worth a punt. On closer examination I think it is an F8B, on the basis of the relationship between last colon and cape,  and the position of the  'dimple' left by the worn rose. What do you think?

Jerry

1860 F8B (2) rev.JPG

1860 F8B (2) obv.JPG

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, secret santa said:

610978557_VicobvBzoom2_edited.jpg.2627fb77a9c276126e5732caf81c63f9.jpg

Would that eclipse on the middle bead also be a tell tale, it’s a well-protected bead for ID, and is also on both coins? Or is this present on other dies?

Edited by Coinery
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Coinery said:

Would that eclipse on the middle bead also be a tell tale, it’s a well-protected bead for ID, and is also on both coins? Or is this present on other dies?

Not quite sure what you mean by the eclipse on the middle bead - is it the tiny indentation on the top of the middle bead in the picture ? If so, then it will only be detectable on the highest grade specimens, and there aren't many in that condition, although it does seem to be present on all the obverse B coins that I own.

It may well be present on my obverse A coins:

916923877_VicobvAzoom-3_edited.jpg.cd6d54296c24a24fa1c9be2c69ca817e.jpg

 

1335355386_VicobvAzoom-4.jpg.be3bdeafcdce10a15162a257f8a55d2a.jpg

 

Posted
4 hours ago, secret santa said:

Not quite sure what you mean by the eclipse on the middle bead - is it the tiny indentation on the top of the middle bead in the picture ? If so, then it will only be detectable on the highest grade specimens, and there aren't many in that condition, although it does seem to be present on all the obverse B coins that I own.

It may well be present on my obverse A coins:

916923877_VicobvAzoom-3_edited.jpg.cd6d54296c24a24fa1c9be2c69ca817e.jpg

 

1335355386_VicobvAzoom-4.jpg.be3bdeafcdce10a15162a257f8a55d2a.jpg

 

Yes I was referring to the bead you mentioned…it sits pretty well protected in a channel between deep devices and looks to be present, even on Jerry’s low-grade example? Of course, if it’s common across other obverses, it’s nothing but a moot point.

IMG_2604.jpeg

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Yesterday at the Midland Coin Fair, an F28 for only £3. Always worth a rummage.

Jerry

1861 F28 (4) rev.jpg

1861 F28 (4) obv.jpg

  • Like 13

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...