Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Just wow! £450-550 estimate, and described as near Very Fine!

Yes, a 1a, but a horrible coin, and no mention of the stress crease/cracks on the reverse from a previous bend!

Argh! Can't upload image! Will try below!

Edited by Coinery
Posted (edited)

IMG_3584.JPG

Do expand the image...it's shocking up close and personal!

Just as a point of interest, this is the same image I couldn't post earlier!

Edited by Coinery
Posted

Well I'm certainly no expert on hammered coins, but if that's NVF, I'm a Dutchman.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Coinery said:

IMG_3584.JPG

Do expand the image...it's shocking up close and personal!

Just as a point of interest, this is the same image I couldn't post earlier!

the picture thing is bloody annoying 

Posted
4 minutes ago, 1949threepence said:

Well I'm certainly no expert on hammered coins, but if that's NVF, I'm a Dutchman.  

obviously a detector find, and been straightened

Posted

Its a nice clear portrait  but the rest of the coin I would struggle to call  much better than fine TBH

Posted

Some mug will buy it as it's Baldwin's. This is why I don't buy from these big name dealers. Rubbish at inflated prices!.

Posted

Out of interest, does anyone know if the graders at the big dealers and auction houses stay relatively unchanged for a number of years, and whether they are well-known and respected in the industry? Is Neil now grading for Baldwins as he used to for Colin Cooke? The only grader I know personally is the chief grader at London Coins ...

Posted

Apart from its massive grade failing, it's also encrusted, corroded, previously creased, scoured, and totally uninspiring as a coin.

most of the class 1 coins I've seen so far have mostly been full-round and well and centrally struck, and mostly they generally seem to wear evenly, leaving a mostly clear and eye-pleasing coin, so it's not unusual or a stand-out example in that respect either! It could barely handle any other problems without being delegated to gap filler.

It's a hammer price I'll be very much interested in.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Paulus said:

Out of interest, does anyone know if the graders at the big dealers and auction houses stay relatively unchanged for a number of years, and whether they are well-known and respected in the industry? Is Neil now grading for Baldwins as he used to for Colin Cooke? The only grader I know personally is the chief grader at London Coins ...

I'm guessing Rob would know? Would be interesting to hear Neil's thoughts on the grade for this one,  especially if the grade were to include the issues, as seems fashionable nowadays.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 04/09/2017 at 11:39 PM, Coinery said:

I'm guessing Rob would know? Would be interesting to hear Neil's thoughts on the grade for this one,  especially if the grade were to include the issues, as seems fashionable nowadays.

It's been a while since I posted on here and meant to come on months ago!!! This I'm guessing was an auction lot for one of our sales last week? I don't do any of the grading or cataloguing for the auctions, consultants are used. I do the grading on the retail side, though any coins on the website which were there before I started were done by the old team.

  • Like 5
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/4/2017 at 6:54 PM, Coinery said:

Just wow! £450-550 estimate, and described as near Very Fine!

Yes, a 1a, but a horrible coin, and no mention of the stress crease/cracks on the reverse from a previous bend!

Argh! Can't upload image! Will try below!

Crazy to think it went for 700 GBP hammer price + costs!

Posted
19 hours ago, Coinery said:

This 1c surprised me too!

 

IMG_3630.PNG

Blimey! That does seem a little excessive :o ...I'm sorry but I wouldn't have paid over 200 quid for that specific coin.

  • Like 1
Posted

in my opinion 271£ for the coin above is in proportion more expensive than the first coin of this discussion ... that I don't think is too bad  :D

this one for example was sold by Spink in September 2014 for 450 + rights

 

14006_232_1-2014919202428_540x360.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Matteo95 said:

in my opinion 271£ for the coin above is in proportion more expensive than the first coin of this discussion ... that I don't think is too bad  :D

this one for example was sold by Spink in September 2014 for 450 + rights

 

14006_232_1-2014919202428_540x360.jpg

That gives it some perspective I guess? Still far too much money for ugly coins, 1a or not! It's looking like a worthy example is going to sail way over £1.5k according to these two previous examples?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Descartes said:

Blimey! That does seem a little excessive :o ...I'm sorry but I wouldn't have paid over 200 quid for that specific coin.

I can only guess that the buyer desperately needed a 1c for the collection?

there does seem to be a rise in the prices for quality Plantagenet coins? I might've joined the party too late.

Back to G6 it is, then! ?

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Coinery said:

I can only guess that the buyer desperately needed a 1c for the collection?

there does seem to be a rise in the prices for quality Plantagenet coins? I might've joined the party too late.

Back to G6 it is, then! ?

Why don't you look at 10th century pennies from EdE to Ae2? They don't seem too hot at the moment and there is plenty of scope for discoveries to be made.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test