Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

mick1271

Newmismatist
  • Posts

    380
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by mick1271

  1. I had noticed that , but put it down to wear as it has been through the wars a bit.Interesting to know that it is a known anomaly .It was worse than that , but some acetone took the worse of the gunk off .
  2. Not quite an acquisition of the week , but another one that was in the bulk lot that threw up the F28 earlier in the year . 1831 W.W Penny .Not the prettiest (especially the reverse) ,but it fills a gap, that would probably have never been filled .
  3. I didn't know they were issuing one with the 1969 obverse. I bought a Bunc one because of the design and theme . Not the sort of thing I normally go for , but I do hang onto any commemorative coins I get in my change (few and far between nowadays)
  4. There is a lot of 1818 fakes .They are good ,but they all have a couple of things in common .A broken garter belt at PENSE and a dink on the forehead . Yours have neither , so looks alright .
  5. I know nothing about these sort of things , but apart from it being highly overpriced , it also looks like a really poor fake .
  6. While I was on . A wee bit of de-lamination on this one .
  7. I saw that one .Put a bid of a couple of quid on it just so I could get a closer look (if I won it) .
  8. I had a 1974 or possibly 75 proof set with a flyer from the mint advertising the 1970 proof set for sale . So they were still selling ,if not minting them a few years later .I am sure I read somewhere that they started minting them after the 1971 proof set was issued , and kept minting them while demand lasted .
  9. They are easy to spot , even in poor condition (as long as the exergue and the sea level is visible , it creates an unbroken band straight across the coin) .My one can only be described as very poor but it is easily identifiable .There always seems to be a couple of equally poor condition ones on ebay , when I look to see if I can find an upgrade .
  10. That should be a video of a Sparrowhawk with a pigeon , but I don't seem to be able to add it .
  11. Yes definitely a Kestrel . They used to be extremely common , but I see more Sparrowhawks than Kestrels nowadays .Starting to make a comeback .
  12. This one had surface Verd spots on both sides . Cleaned it off with acetone and a cotton bud , then treated it with Verdicare .It left the black staining spots where the verd was , but it definitely improved it and didn't harm the lustre .
  13. The obverse was quite good with no verd . cant find the post (FB is a pain nowadays ) ,If I come across it , I will post the obverse up.
  14. Nice little windfall for the owner .Handed down by a relative and didn't have any idea of its value .Some of the coins had notes with them , so her relative did know what it was .
  15. just showed up on a FB page .looks right , but whats peoples thoughts ?
  16. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/A5-PVC-ring-Binder-suitable-for-standard-filofax-size-Black-colour/132183443869?hash=item1ec6bf499d:g:ubEAAOSwi7RZHauE Seen these on ebay .Looks like the same size of holes .
  17. 1987 2ps are bronze , but since 1992 ,they have been copper plated steel .This would probably make a difference in the colour of the corrosion (spots) .
  18. This finally arrived from France after being highlighted on the forum . 1874H 7 over 7 . very poor , but a clear example .
  19. That might be where I have heard his name from . Something to do with Reading coin club as well .Definitely not me lol.
  20. Hi Richard , my 2nd name is Martin .I think there is another Mick Martin in the coin community somewhere, can't remember where I saw his name quoted , but it caused a bit of confusion on my part . Middle initial L if that helps do differentiate .
  21. Same phone I used , Finally got a bit of sun in Scotland .Decent light makes a huge difference .
  22. These ones are a bit lighter . Looks like my scanning skills are nearly as poor as my photography skills .
×
×
  • Create New...