Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,435

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    258

 Content Type 

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. PWA 1967
    I bet the coin he gives her at the end was Rang. Not seen that for ages and thanks for putting the link up 😊
  2. PWA 1967
    Catalogue online for anyone interested 😊
  3. PWA 1967
    I wasnt aware of that ,is there any other differences please ?.
  4. PWA 1967
    Looking at the picture of just the date it looks like an unbarred H to me.
  5. PWA 1967
    What for 😄
  6. PWA 1967
    The picture you posted above is of a proof coin and yes the currency is the same although you wont find a currency with so good a strike and fields. The Taylor ones you can spot quite easily as a completely different design to the reverse and yes there are patterns for 1797. Plenty to choose from and maybe take your time 😊
  7. PWA 1967
  8. PWA 1967
    Have you ever had anything delivered by Fedex Mike ,they are a law to themselves .
  9. PWA 1967
    If your lucky enough to just pay the 5% , a couple of times my final payment with bits and pieces has made the final payment much more. ☚ī¸
  10. PWA 1967
    What a fantastic collection a hat off for putting them together and quality.I was going to say good luck but dont think you will need it as they will sell themselves đŸ˜ļ
  11. PWA 1967
    https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/EDWARD-V11-1908-UNC-PENNY-WITH-FULL-LUSTRE-F164-STUNNING-COIN/332739286134?hash=item4d78ce9476:g:CVsAAOSwDu5bXICM https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/GEO-V-1913-UNC-PENNY-WITH-FULL-LUSTRE-F175-STUNNING-SCARCE/332741241246?hash=item4d78ec699e:g:j1IAAOSwDu5bYCkm Nice coins but not the right attribution and would not like someone to pay way over the top. Pete.
  12. PWA 1967
    No the mixed lot Peck 😄
  13. PWA 1967
    No......Keep going there is nothing else happening 😄
  14. PWA 1967
    I think there will be a few sales which also helps with duplicates and possibly better for the seller. If there are four of something as an example better to sell one in four sales maybe. It also may help buyers who have a budget to spend.
  15. PWA 1967
    Only just got this Peck................Hat Off 😊
  16. PWA 1967
    Not everyone 😊
  17. PWA 1967
    Yes ÂŖ1.00 to much although atleast the buyer cant loose much when he finds out what it is.
  18. PWA 1967
    How much is that in ÂŖs Bob ?. Couple on there that look familiar
  19. PWA 1967
    Thats a good one Mike and not worth bothering about looking for another.
  20. PWA 1967
    Yes like anything if the buyer is happy its all that matters
  21. PWA 1967
    i bet Fiona thought you were winding her up Mike or bonkers. A hidden watermark such as a lion or a lamb
  22. PWA 1967
    http://www.londoncoins.co.uk/?page=Pastresults&searchterm=1858+Large+Rose&searchtype=1 Either size date are scarce ,so doesnt really matter ,obviously the rose is on the reverse If you look at LOT 2652 & LOT 1810 its the same Large date as you have and the description notes,underlying figure.
  23. PWA 1967
    No....Ian. There are not any known obvious overdates on the large rose.,just small date and large date.The one you are thinking of is the one you bought off me that maybe over something but cant be certain what.
  24. PWA 1967
    Yes it was a really good price for the seller Mike
  25. PWA 1967
    I was really happy with this one as purchased a while ago not attributed as a large rose in an auction.They are quite scarce in any grade ,so to send it to cgs for Freya and it come back as 80 was a bonus. Makes looking and searching worthwhile sometimes . Pete.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test