Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Nordle11

Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,852

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    66

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Nordle11

  1. Nordle11
    Yeah, histro-contrast up to 100%, brightness up a bit then zoomed in like a madman. The teeth to the border aren't so easy to spot, but the tips of the teeth are a little bit easier.
  2. Nordle11
    Hi Mr. T, there are 186 denticles on the reverse.
  3. Nordle11
    Add them to the useful links thread!
  4. Nordle11
    Cheers I couldn't find it for the life of me!
  5. Nordle11
    No idea then, have a quick search but "1897 dot" doesn't bring up anything!
  6. Nordle11
    Along with the strange die pairing and the not completely blank space below the date, it certainly beckons being scrutinised.
  7. Nordle11
    I didn't know there were varieties of the 1897 flaw, you're not thinking of the 1946 round dot and diamond dot we were talking about the other week? I can't find the thread through searches anyway but it's a little difficult on here.
  8. Nordle11
    This one was sold last year as a 'no h' and has good detail, however was on the 12+N pairing. It also went for £1500 so you'd hope the bidder knew what they were doing..
  9. Nordle11
    Or that it began as a very small chip and wore away progressively, so this was one of the first struck with this flaw and with each subsequent strike the dot became more prominent. Much better, and looks good to me!
  10. Nordle11
    Happy birthday Bob, best wishes and have a great day!
  11. Nordle11
    Hi Ian, you might have one with a very faint dot, I assume it's the slight bump to the left of that small chip and not the chip itself? Here's mine overlapped on your picture, I put a yellow dot where it should be to help.
  12. Nordle11
    Haha I'm glad it wasn't just me, Rob truly is a machine when it comes to anything coin related and you can have a great chat and will always learn something new. And yes, I'm tall enough at 6'1" but I'm still looking up when we talk
  13. Nordle11
    David Craddock's table is the first for me, being a penny man he's always got something good on display.
  14. Nordle11
    Straight from Elizabeth? Big jump, expect varieties galore in comparison!
  15. Nordle11
    Thanks VS, that's extremely dear though!
  16. Nordle11
    I should add that Colin Cooke's refers to 2 varieties of 8, one being thin and one being thick. Perhaps this is the thick variety? I still think the 5 is struck over something though, you can see something protruding at the tip of the 5.
  17. Nordle11
    Looks like reverse 1 obverse A, with a 5 over a possible 3? I'm not sure on the 8 however, I think it might just be flat from wear, I can't find any reference to the 8 being overstruck..
  18. Nordle11
    Do they not use an extremely powerful microscope to check the area, just to make sure it is what they say it is? I can't remember the specific name of the technique though, but you can get a local university to do it for you.
  19. Nordle11
    Too right, double that's not going to happen either..
  20. Nordle11
    That's good news, this should be a bloody good one for the penny lads then if they've started by listing this lot!
  21. Nordle11
    Well I'm not 100% sure but I really don't remember seeing the Gouby X, the 1909 Freeman 169 or the 1922/27 just to name a few when the preview first came out, so maybe they're just slow in the process of getting the whole collection up. We can be hopeful, at least!
  22. Nordle11
    You never know, maybe they've just not added the whole collection yet..
  23. Nordle11
    This is probably better off in here too VR Court Penny Survey Sorry if it's already here
  24. Nordle11
    There's a variety where the waves are missing to the left of the lighthouse.
  25. Nordle11
    In a dealer's bowl?! What a find. It was probably Scott who found it
×
×
  • Create New...
Test