scott

shall we start on the Edwards?.... looking at the 9.. it looks smaller.

incedently the narrowist 1897 i could find is this one 1899 wide

oh not seen that one. its hard to find the 96 wide as well 1897 wide

1770+ farthings, like 3 obvious reverse dies... even 1771 has 3 varieties lol

1897 have visiable variations. close 7 and far 7 are miles apart

get far more zimbabwe dollars for £1

40x face is £2.40 on a sixpence i would as well

no 1956.. curse them

1728 sixpence with plumes. all i can say is.. its better then mine VF, but whats going on on the Obverse

the very first one

the person gradining it was a drung as the guy who carved the 7 into the dye

do love a good roman, i got a few recently myself

looks to be a tin farthing. the plug in the middle gives it away

whats the differance then? cos one is so worn, i would never be able to tell any

if he started on tiny date spreads we would have far to many 1860-63 bun varieties

they are listed in a book we all know of though small rose is listed as more valuable for both years the differance is minute though. from i gather is the large rose nearly touches the shields i believe this is a small shield, the gap is larger but not by much http://www.coins-of-the-uk.co.uk/pics/ones2.html differance is in here

no idea tbh, not many people know about the differant rose sizes

I wish people would stop knowing they had those 1903 opens.. i want one cheap >.> i look at 1908 and 1909 as well. but really, we have the 1870 wide and narrow which is what? 1 tooth? and we got the the OH viccies that dont count, the few differant 1902's (isn't there 2 versions of LT )

its stripey? what? defo cleaned, copepr doesnt tone like that, i have seen brass tone in rainbows with silver, and natuaral toning is pleasent this is not natural. although a cleaned copper coin can tone nicely... this hasn't

you can see the higher 4 is closer to the top of the exergue

makes me want to make some fakes and put under the portrait, sucker and list it in a similar way

they sign for man city item gone btw

1750-1850? but so much good stuff before and after that. especially the early 20th century stuff and the many 17th century jetons I think I have one of those overdate centimes.

depends doesn't it? i know french coins had both mint and privy marks and i tohugh some hammered pieces has 2 marks as well.

you can't have Lady jane Grey, and its just the specific monarchs, if Matilda is possible it would be fun. would love a philip and mary double portrait but, those are way out of my league, even a very worn example is over £20. and that defies the point of having it >.> I think both my mary and Philip and pary are groats. well, Philip and mary is sort of 60% of a groat but they are a pain to find. i think the shilling is on my wants list, but they go for far too much. especially as some are dated. my main focus, as it should be is the war of the roses currently.