-
Welcome to predecimal.com
The largest British Coin Forum in the world, with almost 200,000 coin related posts and over 22 years of activity. Serious numismatic discussions, new discoveries and highly knowledgeable members. We also strive to be a welcoming place for beginners.
If you're new, thank you for coming. If you've been here for many years - thank you for making this what it is, my sincere gratitude for your support and all the activity over the decades.
C H Perkins, October 2025
Update 14/1/26: Items For Sale and Wanted can now be found in the Members Only area.
-
Images
Forums
-
British Coin forums
-
- 103.1k
- posts
-
- 1.7k
- posts
-
-
Other Coin related forums
-
- 13.7k
- posts
-
- 26.1k
- posts
-
- 4k
- posts
-
- 1.5k
- posts
-
- 4k
- posts
-
-
For Sale or Wanted
-
- 1
- post
-
- 1
- post
-
-
Nothing whatsoever to do with coins area!
-
- 2.4k
- posts
-
- 15.6k
- posts
-
-
Members
-
Member Statistics
-
Purchase The Bronze Coinage of Great Britain (1860 - 1970) directly from sister-site Coin Publications:
-
Current Donation Goals
-
Recent Posts
-
I completely agree about the common coin in uncommonly good condition being something to relish. The 1873 shilling I sold to Geoff Cope when he was desperate to find something to buy close to the end is one in question. I bought it from Andrew Wayne's sale at London Coins 110, lot 1046, 1873 shilling where I paid just over 200 for it. However, all good things come to an end, and with a date run of 3rd young head shillings still in the collection all in similar grade and toning due to being a bit too nice to sell, a decision had to be made when I needed funds for something else, so it went in the trays for about 3 years. Couldn't sell it for love nor money because everyone thought it wasn't worth book price, which I was asking. Sold it to Geoff for book price (about 500 at the time) who said 'Ooh, that's nice. I'll have that one' and lo and behold, a few years later sold for CHF 5500, or about 10 or 11 times what he paid as a top pop 66. So at least two other people appreciated the quality and it was worth at least most of that at today's prices. The colours on it were genuinely superb and the best of the bunch, but I made the decision to get rid of all bar and keep the higher graded and near perfect 1874. Reminds me of Non's 1843. -
It looks to me as if there was nearly a brockage, as the raised detail of the teeth is the incuse detail on the die. If a coin is not properly expelled between strikes, it will act as the die and leave an incuse detailed impression, because a die has the inverted relief, ie incuse is raised an vice versa, so to have raised 'incuse detail', it had to be a wrong-un, because the die would not have changed its relief and would strike normally, albeit off-centre. With several examples known, the detail must have been from a trapped coin.
-
Yes, wrong words used lol. double struck .I'm sure this type is noted in Peck , so not a one off.
-
By Martinminerva · Posted
Spectacular, but not a die clash. This has been completely struck twice and rotated in the dies between striking. -
My most extreme die clash .Apologies, not a penny (1696 Halfpenny) .
-
-
Most Contributions
-
-
Tell a friend
