More Pennies

[PWA 1967]

Dont know if this is any interest to anyone. Although i have posted in pennies, it also covers other bronze.

These were amendments freeman made after his first bronze book, showing some that he had estimated to be less rare than he originally thought or at the time of print didnt know existed, such as the 1860 Halfpenny mule, 1870 Dot penny etc.

[PWA 1967]

[secret santa]

Where does this come from, Pete ?

[PWA 1967]

1 hour ago, secret santa said:

Where does this come from, Pete ?

It was inside a copy of the 1970 First edition i bought a few months ago and hadnt seen one before.

[Bronze & Copper Collector]

7 hours ago, PWA 1967 said:

It was inside a copy of the 1970 First edition i bought a few months ago and hadnt seen one before.

These, if I am correct, are you amongst the updates included in the second (1986) edition. 

 

[Martinminerva]

19 minutes ago, Bronze & Copper Collector said:

These, if I am correct, are you amongst the updates included in the second (1986) edition.

Not quite all, though... Eg. the mule 1860 halfpenny listed above as 260A does not appear in the 1986 or subsequent editions, instead there the one given 260A is the missing knot 1*+A, but non-mule, and 260B its proof. Wonder why he never mentioned again such a mule piece? I believe a few are now known?

Edited 3 hours ago by Martinminerva
Tweak.

[PWA 1967]

Some were although some not and the two page ammendment sheet put inside the 1970 book at a later date.

The 1909 F169 is another and says should be R15 although was in the later books as R9.

Nothing amazing and was just posted for anyone who may be interested.

[PWA 1967]

14 minutes ago, Martinminerva said:

Not quite all, though... Eg. the mule 1860 halfpenny listed above as 260A does not appear in the 1986 or subsequent editions, instead there the one given 260A is the missing knot 1*+A, but non-mule, and 260B its proof. Wonder why he never mentioned again such a mule piece? I believe a few are now known?

I didnt know there was now a few of the mule and thought there was only the one, sold by Hiram Brown. I would buy one today for much more than it sold for at Noonans and will have to start looking now 👍

[Bronze & Copper Collector]

11 minutes ago, Martinminerva said:

Not quite all, though... Eg. the mule 1860 halfpenny listed above as 260A does not appear in the 1986 or subsequent editions, instead there the one given 260A is the missing knot 1*+A, but non-mule, and 260B its proof. Wonder why he never mentioned again such a mule piece? I believe a few are now known?

It was the basis of the updates, subject to his future decisions.

He later removed the milled penny (that I recently sold) from the catalog after receiving an assessment from the Royal Mint that it was a post mint alteration.

Just as his 1970 edition was an extension of his several updated versions of his penny studies expanded to include half pennies, farthings,  patterns, trials, etc.

There are ALWAYS corrections,  updates, modifications, etc to a work of this magnitude. 

There have been many new discoveries to add to Peck, Braman, Freeman, etc. No guide/catalog is a final authority, it merely contains information known at the time.

They grow, mature, learn, make adjustments and corrections, expand as a living being.

[secret santa]

Regarding pennies, an addition not incorporated into the 1985 edition:

Page 31, number 80A (1875 8+H with H below date) - can we assume that this coin does not exist ?

I have never seen it referenced anywhere, including Gouby.

[Martinminerva]

40 minutes ago, secret santa said:

Regarding pennies, an addition not incorporated into the 1985 edition:

Page 31, number 80A (1875 8+H with H below date) - can we assume that this coin does not exist ?

I have never seen it referenced anywhere, including Gouby.

I see London Coins sold this piece below a decade or so ago, concluding it was a doctored piece (is it???) with the H presumably added post-mint. Maybe this is the one Freeman saw and then had second thoughts?  Did any forum member buy it, perhaps? Seemed a fair price for such a curio!