Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

I posted this 1931 penny the other day in the die clogs thread as a "missing waves" variety, Just noted the date looked odd

BP%201931%20AA%201.jpg

comparison of dates  with a normal 1931

1931%20dates.jpg

That upper loop of the 3 looks decidedly larger to me, comments welcome

Posted
58 minutes ago, davidrj said:

I posted this 1931 penny the other day in the die clogs thread as a "missing waves" variety, Just noted the date looked odd

BP%201931%20AA%201.jpg

comparison of dates  with a normal 1931

1931%20dates.jpg

That upper loop of the 3 looks decidedly larger to me, comments welcome

 

David, I think you are right! Also it looks to me like the top 9 is closed, and the bottom 9 is open. :)

Posted

Any signs of acid attack as all the four datal figures look to be slightly thinner? Are the letters of the legend also a little thinner. If so, that plus elimination of the very low relief might indicate a chemical reason.

Posted
2 hours ago, Rob said:

Any signs of acid attack as all the four datal figures look to be slightly thinner? Are the letters of the legend also a little thinner. If so, that plus elimination of the very low relief might indicate a chemical reason.

Everything else looks normal to me, a bog standard circulated 1931. I'm 90% convinced that missing waves are a result of grease fill rather than die alteration/wear/other damage and may possibly occur in all dates 1927-36. The 1934 will probably stay at a premium as it featured in a high profile sale and is to be included in the new Freeman. I'm waiting on delivery of a high grade 1929 which looks interesting.

As for the 3, I have no answer at present, I don't think it's an optical illusion due to the surrounded verdegris, but...

I'm hoping forum members will take the time to look in their caches of GV pennies to see if anything similar turns up

Posted
6 hours ago, RLC35 said:

 

David, I think you are right! Also it looks to me like the top 9 is closed, and the bottom 9 is open. :)

Just to add to the fun, the beads appear different, but this might be the photograph and the rims seem to be different thicknesses.

Posted
22 minutes ago, DaveG38 said:

Just to add to the fun, the beads appear different, but this might be the photograph and the rims seem to be different thicknesses.

Agreed, I'll give it an acetone bath,and will rescan it with another similar grade one with identical illumination.

Posted (edited)

Mine is an open 3 as well but with a closed 9

Edited by jacinbox
Posted
3 hours ago, davidrj said:

As for the 3, I have no answer at present, I don't think it's an optical illusion due to the surrounded verdegris, but...

 

....amazing what a good clean can do, sorry guys but I think there is no difference

1931.jpg

:( Not going to make my fortune on this one

David

 

Posted

They just look thicker and thinner to me, but the same 3. Not just different strikes in a die's life?

Posted

The 1929 has just arrived

BP%201929%20B%201.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Nordle11 said:

They just look thicker and thinner to me, but the same 3. Not just different strikes in a die's life?

There's a forum member ?Gary who is very good at overlays, anyone know how it's done?

Posted

You can use any application that has a transparency setting, just make one picture a little more transparent so you can see the background image and overlay it. If no-one has done one by tomorrow I'll mock one up but I have meetings for the rest of the day and don't have any app like that at home.

Posted

Alfnail is the best and that is the only answer overlays.

Looking again the two comparisons are  the same its the photos that are different...:)

Can you help please Ian.........although i am sure you have better things to do.

Posted
1 hour ago, PWA 1967 said:

They are all the same Gary or am i missing something ?.

Aye

Posted
On ‎15‎/‎06‎/‎2016 at 2:40 AM, davidrj said:

I posted this 1931 penny the other day in the die clogs thread as a "missing waves" variety, Just noted the date looked odd

BP%201931%20AA%201.jpg

comparison of dates  with a normal 1931

1931%20dates.jpg

That upper loop of the 3 looks decidedly larger to me, comments welcome

I just found just one of these in my spares box of about 80   1931s, and have noticed that it also has a dropped 9 which is distinctly lower than the other digits   Terry

Posted

it looks, to the eye, like the 3 is higher on missing waves, due to the shape of the 3

1037812.jpg

got this the other day, another missing waves, same deal with the 3.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test