Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

terrysoldpennies

Sterling Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    801

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

 Content Type 

Everything posted by terrysoldpennies

  1. terrysoldpennies
    Jerry , its as you say about the 1915 clogged 5. I bought one four years back for £15, and at the time I thought, have I paid to much , but I haven't seen another for sale since Terry
  2. terrysoldpennies
    Thanks for the info. Terry
  3. terrysoldpennies
    Pete . is this magnifier USB connected for a computer Terry
  4. terrysoldpennies
    8 years of looking , I've have one , seen one other fully formed, and Richards ,not quite two serifs Terry
  5. terrysoldpennies
    I must confess , I don't know why they should be round or sometimes oval, but they seem to form mostly along the cracks that are in the legend, as can be seen on Richards coin, where a smaller dot on the left of the O must later enlarge to link into the side of the O. I don't know the exact way they are made , but maybe the bronze is soft and creates a bubble of metal in the form of a blob Terry
  6. terrysoldpennies
    Ian .The die would a Mirror image of the face of the coin ,so a dot standing up off the coin would on the die be a hole, so to remove, it the hole would have to be filled. My guess is that tiny edge parts along the side of the die crack, broke away leaving a small hole, or in this case two holes.
  7. terrysoldpennies
    I think they are the result of a tiny die crack Terry
  8. terrysoldpennies
    Full coin
  9. terrysoldpennies
    Sorry to all you non dot penny collectors . This Obverse double dot type is only found on the 1897 high tide penny
  10. terrysoldpennies
    ''Flown''
  11. terrysoldpennies
    Art commissions taken, see my manager
  12. terrysoldpennies
    the picture Terry
  13. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T. Difficult to explain, so hence the diagram , Looking at normal bright uncirculated pennies of the 60s there is no sign of scratches at all , but on this one the minute scratches run down the right side of the coin , and some also run in a slightly different direction across the exergue. no scratches can be seen on the raised parts , like the lighthouse shield or waves, so it looks as though a engineer has used something like an abrasive paper just on the top left side of the die, I shall try to get a close up some time Terry Ps I am try to add the drawing , bare with me
  14. terrysoldpennies

    Hi Richard. I wondered if I might ask you a few things.    The 2* 145, have you heard of any more being found other than the four I already know of.

    2  You list your 1967 missing waves as R8, how many of this type do you know of .

    3  I have a 1953 penny with the standard B+b [1+B  pairing, but I think it might be a matt finish, as it has a strange kind of sheen, most unlike the normal production coin.  I don't have another toned matt finish to judge it by, except a 1986 matt and polished 2p proof that's in a bright condition.  Have you heard of the possible existence of this type.         I think i might get it checked out at the mint in the summer while on holiday. Would you know who to contact about taking the coin along in person, as I don't trust the post with it     Terry

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. terrysoldpennies

      terrysoldpennies

      Sorry Richard . I meant the 1860 penny I found . Thanks for the info on the 1953, it doesn't sound very promising   Terry

    3. secret santa

      secret santa

      Ah yes, 145 teeth - I was a bit slow there. No, still the same 4. I'm sure there are lots of us looking for them too !

      For some reason, I only get to see this conversation when I go to your personal profile and check postings - I get no notification. Do you know why ?

    4. terrysoldpennies

      terrysoldpennies

      Richard . its probably me doing something wrong, I don't know what . but thank you    Terry

  15. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T . I was wondering about how it was caused . when you look extremely close with a magnifying glass, you can see the minute lines from the grinding of the flat surfaces running right through from the open flat area, into the bare area where the waves should [ I must get myself a close up camera] . I thought that if this was caused by grease or dirt , the complete individual wavy would disappear , and not leave just the points of what on the normal coin are much larger waves, so I would think it must be the result of the top of that part of the die being ground down lower , and so loosing definition Terry
  16. terrysoldpennies
    Hi, only me . This type is listed by David Groom in his book , but I have only ever seen the 1967 coin so after buying this from Canada last week I thought you might like to see the picture Terry
  17. terrysoldpennies
    You know Matt ,you have to keep this computer stuff simple for us oldies . I'm just getting the hang of the Babbage model Terry
  18. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T . I see you've left out B+x . can't see why . X rev below Terry
  19. terrysoldpennies
    Your 1904 is 11.5 tooth width with a straight 4. if you look in the forum under 1904 penny varieties 23-10-2013 I think its the second date down Terry
  20. terrysoldpennies
    The 7 in the date, like the HT penny also lays over to the right , and is half a tooth narrower Terry
  21. terrysoldpennies
    Sorry , but it looks to me like the 9 is the result of a die crack across the 9 into the exergue . you can see the blob of metal running down from above Terry
  22. terrysoldpennies
    Hi . as far as I an aware there is no difference in the legend on the two types of 1902 , but the tide height difference is easy to determine . The 1863 open 3 is not always easy to see. Terry
  23. terrysoldpennies
    Hi Azda Your right about the high tide 1897 . but the sure way to tell is by the P in PENNY . The P on the Common type points to the tooth ,on the High Tide it points to the gap between the teeth Terry
  24. terrysoldpennies
    That's the kind of marks left after someone has clamped it in a vice Terry
  25. terrysoldpennies
    It do's look like it is the same type in the first stage of breakdown, we'll have to keep looking for others at differing stages of deterioration Terry
×
×
  • Create New...
Test