Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

terrysoldpennies

Sterling Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    794

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    56

 Content Type 

Everything posted by terrysoldpennies

  1. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T. Difficult to explain, so hence the diagram , Looking at normal bright uncirculated pennies of the 60s there is no sign of scratches at all , but on this one the minute scratches run down the right side of the coin , and some also run in a slightly different direction across the exergue. no scratches can be seen on the raised parts , like the lighthouse shield or waves, so it looks as though a engineer has used something like an abrasive paper just on the top left side of the die, I shall try to get a close up some time Terry Ps I am try to add the drawing , bare with me
  2. terrysoldpennies

    Hi Richard. I wondered if I might ask you a few things.    The 2* 145, have you heard of any more being found other than the four I already know of.

    2  You list your 1967 missing waves as R8, how many of this type do you know of .

    3  I have a 1953 penny with the standard B+b [1+B  pairing, but I think it might be a matt finish, as it has a strange kind of sheen, most unlike the normal production coin.  I don't have another toned matt finish to judge it by, except a 1986 matt and polished 2p proof that's in a bright condition.  Have you heard of the possible existence of this type.         I think i might get it checked out at the mint in the summer while on holiday. Would you know who to contact about taking the coin along in person, as I don't trust the post with it     Terry

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. terrysoldpennies

      terrysoldpennies

      Sorry Richard . I meant the 1860 penny I found . Thanks for the info on the 1953, it doesn't sound very promising   Terry

    3. secret santa

      secret santa

      Ah yes, 145 teeth - I was a bit slow there. No, still the same 4. I'm sure there are lots of us looking for them too !

      For some reason, I only get to see this conversation when I go to your personal profile and check postings - I get no notification. Do you know why ?

    4. terrysoldpennies

      terrysoldpennies

      Richard . its probably me doing something wrong, I don't know what . but thank you    Terry

  3. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T . I was wondering about how it was caused . when you look extremely close with a magnifying glass, you can see the minute lines from the grinding of the flat surfaces running right through from the open flat area, into the bare area where the waves should [ I must get myself a close up camera] . I thought that if this was caused by grease or dirt , the complete individual wavy would disappear , and not leave just the points of what on the normal coin are much larger waves, so I would think it must be the result of the top of that part of the die being ground down lower , and so loosing definition Terry
  4. terrysoldpennies
    Hi, only me . This type is listed by David Groom in his book , but I have only ever seen the 1967 coin so after buying this from Canada last week I thought you might like to see the picture Terry
  5. terrysoldpennies
    You know Matt ,you have to keep this computer stuff simple for us oldies . I'm just getting the hang of the Babbage model Terry
  6. terrysoldpennies
    Mr T . I see you've left out B+x . can't see why . X rev below Terry
  7. terrysoldpennies
    Your 1904 is 11.5 tooth width with a straight 4. if you look in the forum under 1904 penny varieties 23-10-2013 I think its the second date down Terry
  8. terrysoldpennies
    The 7 in the date, like the HT penny also lays over to the right , and is half a tooth narrower Terry
  9. terrysoldpennies
    Sorry , but it looks to me like the 9 is the result of a die crack across the 9 into the exergue . you can see the blob of metal running down from above Terry
  10. terrysoldpennies
    This penny was my mothers when she was collecting during the 1960s. She was a lawyer and had working connections with the banks , though I do not know where she obtained it ,but she must have obtained it around the time it was made . It shows no signs of any kind of coating , and even if my penny is a fake , the penny sold by London coins I assume was checked , if not £3500 ponds was a lot to pay for a dud Terry
  11. terrysoldpennies
    I have an Uncirculated 1967 Proof or Speciman coin which was said to not exist . I mentioned it to MG, and he thought it might be worth perhaps £200. Then an EF-UNC was sold on L.Coins in December 14 for £3500. Proofs don't photo well , its the toned one Terry
  12. terrysoldpennies
    Hi . as far as I an aware there is no difference in the legend on the two types of 1902 , but the tide height difference is easy to determine . The 1863 open 3 is not always easy to see. Terry
  13. terrysoldpennies
    Hi Azda Your right about the high tide 1897 . but the sure way to tell is by the P in PENNY . The P on the Common type points to the tooth ,on the High Tide it points to the gap between the teeth Terry
  14. terrysoldpennies
    That's the kind of marks left after someone has clamped it in a vice Terry
  15. terrysoldpennies
    It do's look like it is the same type in the first stage of breakdown, we'll have to keep looking for others at differing stages of deterioration Terry
  16. terrysoldpennies
    P.s I would say the 1880 was the result of the Mint Re engraving the narrow date die rather than an error, though the filing of the old 8 digit must have started to come away. Curios that they re cut the die at all Terry
  17. terrysoldpennies
    Hi. Matt . It's on the common Double exergue . I've Had this penny forever, and have never seen another , even like yours with the single error. Could you post the Pic. Terry
  18. terrysoldpennies
    Hi. This 1940 penny has two obverse die letter faults, probably caused by part of the letters on the die breaking away. this perhaps could be the result of the Mint being less particular about the quality of the coins being produced , maybe due to the constraints of war. I'm not aware of any other penny with two such errors on one face. If you have one , I would love you to post it . Terry
  19. terrysoldpennies
    Sorry I did'nt reply sooner , I've been out bowling this evening . In answer to you question Cliff , I read about it in an on line price guide a couple of years back, I cannot remember which. the Wavy and straight E,s can be found in closed 1903s, and in most years between 1897 and 1905. Pic. shows two 1900 pennies, with some degree of ware , and still seem to be clearly one or the other type , so the difference must be due to different dies, or ware to the dies Terry
  20. terrysoldpennies
    Hi . Richard, I see you have an 1903 open 3 up for sale on e.bay with the straight bottomed E. Having now looked at a few more of the type , I am of the opinion that the wavy type are less common, though none seem to show a very pronounced curving. But before you sell, you might take a look at the Die rotation, as I have found one with the correct alignment, and two with about a 15 degree anticlockwise rotation. Its a surprise to see two variations on such a rare penny. Anyone else who has one, please let us know. Terry
  21. terrysoldpennies
    Sorry, Don't know your name Nordle 11 . Its on A 6+g [J+g] Terry
  22. terrysoldpennies
    They didn't seem to particular were they placed the last digit . look at this one Terry
  23. terrysoldpennies
    This is one of my most interesting die crack coins , A piece of the penny almost the size of the Exergue is about to break away, leaving the line of the border teeth disjointed, and the second 2 enlarged. Terry
  24. terrysoldpennies
    Terry
  25. terrysoldpennies
    I see there's a lot of talk about the 1880 8 over 8 penny, but you could say its a story about two coins, the over date and the original penny with the narrow date that left the ghostly outline. Well I think this is that penny, as the position of the second 8 aligns correctly with the ghost 8. I have had this coin some time now, and have not seen another, even having scoured the net, and coin dealers. I've found nothing mention of it any where, but if it is listed shoot me. There's even more 1877 narrow dates to be found Terry
×
×
  • Create New...
Test