Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

PWA 1967

Expert Grader
  • Posts

    5,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    249

Everything posted by PWA 1967

  1. Hi bunhead and welcome to the forum. Not my thing as prefer to look for the better quality ones,but just thought i would say hello. Pete.
  2. All the best gary and have a great day.
  3. Hard to tell really from the pictures think i can find a better one nordle but thank you anyway. I have a mate looking at one for me in the morning who i trust and hopefully that one will be ok.
  4. Thanks jac,i dont keep the coins here so will have a look next time i get chance.
  5. One of the ones i have is finest known and a good grade. Its got good lustre and looks nice. 1892 and cgs 33386. Its stopped me sending anymore as the pictures look almost black and white. Wasnt happy in general and sure they could take better pictures ,considering its part of the service they provide. Pete.
  6. Thanks paul the coin was graded 82 and quite nice in hand. I sent 22 last time and although was happy with the grades the photos were terrible. It makes it harder to resell some as buyers want the uin and in the process of having a lot of them photographed and wish i had done so before slabbing Pete.
  7. Does not seem to be much happening on the forum recently. One that is toned which normally i would keep away from as its really dark and the photo not the best. IMO is a nice even tone and a nice strike. 1861 F22 4+D and again c.g.s. 4231 Pete.
  8. Read the article with interest ,i have quite a few with the royal mint letters. Hard to put a price on a coin that is really looked at being a curiosity. For that reason you can get caught up in a coin you consider scarce but i feel the market is small and therefore does not increase the resale value.
  9. Get well soon Mrs peter and look after her when mrs peter comes home mate.Sure everything will be ok.
  10. Show a photo please of the other side and that should be enough.
  11. Your coin appears to be the older 50p and therefore bigger, is the other side normal. Otherwise IMO its been in acid or corroded . Thanks for posting. Pete.
  12. Hi. Have you got a picture ?.
  13. Thanks for the reply john.
  14. Been mentioned and would like to ask before i put the coin away. Apart from the belly button its a P.T. and the die clash .The feature to the left of the shield and the belly button should not be there. Can anyone see other features on the reverse of this penny ?. Thanks pete.
  15. I hope its not another looney this coin seems to attract them.
  16. Not sure if its an error mate if its post mint.
  17. Not got a clue ,maybe coppers is right and makes sense. Horrible coin though.
  18. Just a quick thanks to jelida for filling a gap with a 1863 open 3 penny. Another thanks to mark who i bought an 1857 P.T. already slabbed. CGS19251
  19. Quality spot on that is one that makes looking for nice coins all worthwhile.
  20. Thanks nordle but its the 1934 i want. I have a 1904 cgs 33395 Pete.
  21. Hat off jac thats a good example.
  22. Hopefully i have an 1863 open 3 off jerry as been looking a while although feel the prices are dropping as people keep finding them. One again off neil paisley 1806 incuse hair curl with a nice tone(picture not the best) cgs 33055
  23. Nice coin for a scarce halfpenny hat off.Did you buy it in the uk ?. I have seen one same grade from australia from someone i bought a couple of pennies off also NGC graded.
  24. Yes brg pictures are quality and always look spot on.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test