Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Peckris

Expert Grader
  • Posts

    9,800
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    53

Everything posted by Peckris

  1. Well done. I should really pull my finger out and get a decent 1948 (don't care about the edge type) - it's a nasty gap in my collection. FWIW my AEF 1949 is the sharp edged variety, but it's not going spare! (Though I'd happily swap it for a similar round edge example as I don't care about the edge distinction - however if the 1949 sharp edge is notably scarcer I would probably hope to swap mine for a better example of the rounded edge).
  2. Oops. I clicked the links beneath that crown, instead of the button at the top that says "View my other items". Ok, that brought up all his stuff, but here's the problem: I wanted to find all his Sold items. But... 1. the normal Advanced Search doesn't allow you to put a seller's name in 2. if you do an Advanced Search from his list, the best you can get is a list of Completed listings and the largest timespan you can search on is the Last 15 days. (Which was interesting, in that 4 pages of BINs - 50 per page - only showed 2 sales! so how he pays for his listings is anyone's guess). How do you get a list of only Sold items for a particular seller? How, for example, did you get to see his Anne 1711?
  3. Yes, that crown price and grade is pretty unbelievable, and so is the feedback of 100% !!! I can only think he/she doesn't usually sell coins on eBay but has loads of other kinds of stuff. Unfortunately there is no way to check because if you click any of the "View my other items" links it brings up a window saying there's no items currently in auction or wherever.
  4. Hire her as your cleaner? (Lock your coins away first )
  5. Hi at all! Unfortunately that link does not work any more. Does anybody of you have a copy of that pdf, still? So, please share that one once again. This article seems to be very interesting and I would like to include the citation into the literature section of my documentation. Many thanks!! Christoph The link doesn't work for me either, and I was the one who uploaded it! And after a computer disaster in January I've lost a few months of data including the scans I made of the articles. My scanner doesn't work with my latest computer so I can't re-do them. So if anyone has kept their download I too would be very grateful.
  6. The 'specimen sets' (brightly coloured holders; available from Post Offices for around £20) could be ok. However, the proof sets are hugely overpriced by the Royal Mint and can generally be got a year or three later at auctions for less than half their original issue price.
  7. I'd concur - VF money would be my bet, perhaps a little bit more. The hairlines may not look so bad in hand, after all the coin is greatly magnified.
  8. Where are you getting the shield from? I can't see it. Nor any design elements at all.
  9. Unlike a "roast beef" tax in this country
  10. It's almost possible to comprehend why someone could confuse 'lustre' with 'polished'. Probably only 20 points off an IQ assessment for that. But to describe it as 'uncirculated'.....? ...rather than "Worn to f*@!"
  11. Peckris

    Spink

    Just a pity there isn't a cut-down version of the Standard Catalogue which we could buy for - say £10 - and download to our computers.
  12. Commonly but incorrectly. Technically an evasion has some legend alteration so that it stands out from the official coinage,eg "GEORGE RULES" This is certainly a contemporary forgery halfpenny based on the mint dies. Well, a date of 1776 would certainly qualify as an evasion, then! Sounds more like an evacuation! Not so much evasion as exlaxasion
  13. Commonly but incorrectly. Technically an evasion has some legend alteration so that it stands out from the official coinage,eg "GEORGE RULES" This is certainly a contemporary forgery halfpenny based on the mint dies. Well, a date of 1776 would certainly qualify as an evasion, then!
  14. No. Spink make it quite clear in their catalogue that the prices quoted for UNC copper/bronze is "with full mint lustre". £150 for a BU 1895 halfpenny? Ye gods. Even Spink's £70 is going some. It's nowhere near as scarce as even the second issue penny.
  15. Peckris

    Amazing

    Port and kippers? Euwww. Peck you should go for it.Everything cancels out for an afternoon lovefest.
  16. £45 in F according to Spink 2005. It can't have gone up that much! That link doesn't work (Strangely, this Reply shows it beginning "http", but the actual post has some gunk in front of that, including "newtab". Weird, or what?) Wow, your edit must have gone through the instant I clicked Add Reply! Thanks, Paul! A damaged/spiked and nastily cleaned one too, a very lucky Monsieur would get £45 in 2012! Oh that's perfectly normal apparently
  17. £45 in F according to Spink 2005. It can't have gone up that much! That link doesn't work (Strangely, this Reply shows it beginning "http", but the actual post has some gunk in front of that, including "newtab". Weird, or what?) Wow, your edit must have gone through the instant I clicked Add Reply!
  18. One of our members, scott, is interested in foreign coins of all types, so he may run his eye over those, though they may be too modern for him. (I know little or nothing about them). The UK coins are not worth anything except face value really. The 2008 20p MAY (but probably not) be the undated 'mule' type - but if you already see it's 2008, then it isn't (if that doesn't sound Irish). Your worn coppers are most likely to be George III halfpennies - the date on the second will be 1775, the last year of mintage of that particular series. Of no value but historically interesting. If the first one that you can't read the date on, has the bust facing in the opposite direction to the second, then it's George II. Hope you rekindle an interest in coins. You will see from all the discussions here, it's a fascinating hobby Oh I almost forgot - gold prices are quite high now. Depending on grade, your 1913 half sov is worth AT LEAST bullion value, maybe more.
  19. A reasonably high grade example (AEF): http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/1915-LARGE-BRONZE-PENNY-King-GEORGE-V-GREAT-BRITAIN-/390474845484?pt=US_World_Coins&hash=item5aea1d4d2c#ht_3123wt_932
  20. 1926 halfcrowns suffered a similar fate with the No Colon variety, as I recall! Also 1961 halfcrowns "E.F. designer initials missing reverse" - I bought an example of this in 1978, but at no great premium, so I'm not downcast! However, there are clear cut 'no stop' varieties which aren't blocked dies - the 1787 shilling comes to mind.
  21. I think you are on the right line, coincidentally the only other year that saw this number of overdates/reuse of dies was 1848, and the same numbers were in use as well 3, 6 and 7 Both Peck and Freeman assume that the bronze changeover was planned for 1860, but original Mint records relating to it may not have been available to either. Certainly the French had changed over by 1852. But it is significant that there was a massive mintage of pennies (compared to previous years) in 1854 and 1855. Was that to satisfy demand during the period of changeover? It's interesting that - compared with, say, 1971 bronzes - the first year's mintage of the new coinage (1860) was modest compared to the following 3 years. Scope for study, I'd say.
  22. You've included several alloys there Rob - shouldn't the "Silver 0.500" be amended to show the various compositions of silver alloy used from 1920 to 1946 (and 1986)?
  23. Despite it being such a common date, the sheer number of 1858 varieties rather points towards the introduction of bronze being delayed for a couple of years? It's almost as if they said, "Oh well, we're not going to meet the deadline, but there's still a demand for pennies, let's see what's lying around that can be over-dated." And having firmly decided to postpone, they would then have been ready for 1859 in good time, a date for which there are not a large number of varieties. (The 1859 penny is, I think, possible evidence that the 1858 effort wasn't simply using up older dies to save on cutting new dies before 1860.) The 1860 copper is invariably an overdate and rare, suggesting that the production of bronze coins for 1860 was either not quite on time, or didn't meet full demand. I think the former is more likely when you look at the comparatively modest mintage of 1860 bronze pennies compared with the massive mintages for 1861,62,63.
  24. What are the 1863 varieties? I must check mine out. Dot under lighthouse Do you have any pictures? There was one in the colin cooke collection 2006- It is still on the website even 6 years after colins death - A fantastic tribute to him and probably there for good - even more useful than colin's site (sorry colin) I just had a look at Colin's site - despite being BU the picture isn't large enough to make it out unfortunately. What did you mean by the "other" Colin Cooke site? I only know his main one.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test