I seem to recall as this coin came up for auction and looked at it. With all due respect rejected it sadly as a specimen or proof. As I have said, and have had both of the 1924 satin specimen halfpennies had some interest in it. But not to be a killjoy and hope you enjoy this one...
At the time of buying the coin, Barker, of Hull, said he was “over the moon” when he discovered how unique it was.
So, how unique is it ? Rather unique ? Quite unique ? Very unique ? A trifle unique ?
I'm afraid that the word "unique" is going the way of "literally" and "amazing" - i.e. becoming meaningless.