Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted

Talk about dream coin - look at the cover coin LOT 540 and the next LOT 541....take them both?

Posted

Yes, the only things that are very attractive are equally unaffordable. Unfortunately the dragon mark is one of those gaps that is unlikely ever to be filled. :(

Posted

Talking of the Spink catalogue, how would you lot grade this?

post-4737-0-59215500-1417280655_thumb.jp

Posted

GVF-NEF

How do you come to that conclusion Dave - where do you see wear, especially on the reverse?

Posted (edited)

Perhaps poor picture coupled with aye phone viewing but i see wear in the orb onthr REV, beard looks to have wear also, conservitavely grading as its difficult with the given picture. Tails of the 3 lions bottom right has wear unless its the picture

Edited by azda
Posted

Perhaps poor picture coupled with aye phone viewing but i see wear in the orb onthr REV, beard looks to have wear also, conservitavely grading as its difficult with the given picture. Tails of the 3 lions bottom right has wear unless its the picture

I think it's your Aye Phone Dave - I can't even see the lions' tails bottom right, on a 21.5" Mac screen! But you're right about the picture - it's the supplied size unfortunately, so I can't give you a larger one.

Posted

GEF, not the best strike & obverse less attractive than sometimes seen. On coins like these, I do like to check the rims and edges - and these look fairly sharp without damage/dings, etc. On a 70 scale, I'd go 55-58 unless seen in hand. Have to forget the 100 point scale as the markers and all seem to be in more flux than the 70 pt. system. Anyway, that reverse looks good to my eye.

Posted

That's pretty much what I thought. Spink's grade? "very fine".

I kid you not. Have a look and see for yourselves. It's not the only case of wild underestimate at that.

Posted

I seem to like Spink grades. According to their book the coin have to be close to MS 70 for them to be classed as UNC but our friends from across the border equate the MS 60s to UNC. So if the Spink auction house grades a coin as AU then it is perhaps already past the MS 60 grade of NGC or PCGS. I hope I am making sense here :o

Posted

I seem to like Spink grades. According to their book the coin have to be close to MS 70 for them to be classed as UNC but our friends from across the border equate the MS 60s to UNC. So if the Spink auction house grades a coin as AU then it is perhaps already past the MS 60 grade of NGC or PCGS. I hope I am making sense here :o

Yeah, but "very fine" for a coin that's OBVIOUSLY better than a UK EF is - to my mind - absurd. It's not even consistent - I've seen the odd over-grading in that catalogue too.

Posted (edited)

Yes they are conservative as a rule.. I've seen an MS62 graded hammered gold cracked out and graded as nice VF by Spink..

Edited by Nicholas

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test