oldcopper Posted December 3, 2021 Posted December 3, 2021 Coming up in the Feb DNW auction, this bun head penny is described as being on a halfpenny flan. It looks too big for that but maybe I'm wrong. https://www.dnw.co.uk/auctions/catalogue/lot.php?auction_id=625&lot_uid=411115 Quote
VickySilver Posted December 3, 2021 Posted December 3, 2021 (edited) It will tend to flatten out with the strike but it is curious how much detail is showing in the devices. No weight listed.... As much as we. pound on this point, weights are frequently left out on slabs and else wise and catalogue listings... Edited December 3, 2021 by VickySilver correction Quote
Rob Posted December 3, 2021 Posted December 3, 2021 2 hours ago, VickySilver said: It will tend to flatten out with the strike but it is curious how much detail is showing in the devices. No weight listed.... As much as we. pound on this point, weights are frequently left out on slabs and else wise and catalogue listings... There's no weakness whatsoever at the periphery, nor is there any indication of metal flow. A bun head halfpenny superimposed on a penny would cover from the rim at 12 o'clock to the exergue line, whilst a copper halfpenny covers the area seen. However, I can't see the mint having spare 29mm copper blanks lying around in 1877 (unless for a late strike proof halfpenny). The closest in size would be a florin. i.e. I'm not convinced that's a halfpenny flan. We therefore have to consider the alternatives. Anyone familiar with colonial issues that could match the size seen? A third option could be a TPG error - a regular penny inadvertently slabbed in a halfpenny holder, with the missing bits hidden in a polymer sandwich Quote
Mr T Posted December 3, 2021 Posted December 3, 2021 6 hours ago, Rob said: We therefore have to consider the alternatives. Anyone familiar with colonial issues that could match the size seen? A third option could be a TPG error - a regular penny inadvertently slabbed in a halfpenny holder, with the missing bits hidden in a polymer sandwich That's more likely - maybe Guyana or Cypress? I didn't hunt down a bigger picture but I can't see fishtailing on the letters which is supposed to confirm an undersize planchet I thought. Quote
Mr T Posted December 4, 2021 Posted December 4, 2021 7 hours ago, Mr T said: That's more likely - maybe Guyana or Cypress? Too early for Cyprus or Straits Settlements and British Honduras is what I was thinking of when I wrote Guyana, but the British Honduras cent was copper and 29mm - I think there is probably more than 2mm missing there. Quote
secret santa Posted December 4, 2021 Posted December 4, 2021 8 hours ago, Mr T said: Cypress? These coins don't grow on trees you know. 2 Quote
Mr T Posted December 10, 2021 Posted December 10, 2021 5mm-6mm difference - I think it probably is a halfpenny planchet. Quote
Zo Arms Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 Watched the auction today on my phone. Muted by auctioneer. This lot didn't get an airing. Anyone in the room able to say what happened to it? Quote
secret santa Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 1 hour ago, Zo Arms said: This lot didn't get an airing. Which lot ? Quote
Zo Arms Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 10 minutes ago, secret santa said: Which lot ? Sorry. The coin in the link at the start of this thread. I was interested in the 1878 halfpenny, a few lots further on. The above lot was skipped over. But without audio, I never heard why. Quote
Peckris 2 Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 I bid live with the video on, but didn't win anything I don't know what happened to that particular lot. Quote
secret santa Posted February 1, 2022 Posted February 1, 2022 I listened - there were no bids so it was passed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.