Halfpenny ID check

[Zo Arms]

Evening all. I'm still alive.

Silly question time. Picked this up on eBay the other day. 1875. The wide spacing of the colon, in relation to the G of REG, would suggest obverse 13.

Thoughts on whether the T's of BRITT are sufficiently touching, to make it a 13#, sought. 

Desperate coin I know. Been delivered but working away from home at mo, so sellers photos.

[Zo Arms]

[Zo Arms]

[Zo Arms]

And a screenshot of Bernie's 13#, to show the relationship between the I and the T's.

[Martinminerva]

Think it's a penny, Bob - bust of Victoria too big and too near linear circle at top to be a halfpenny. D'oh !!

[Zo Arms]

1 hour ago, Martinminerva said:

Think it's a penny, Bob - bust of Victoria too big and too near linear circle at top to be a halfpenny. D'oh !!

Of course it is.

Listed as a half penny but I was to busy looking at the finer detail to notice the elephant.

I'm back home tonight but yes. Definitely a penny. Thanks.

[DrLarry]

In the past few months I have been working on the identification of an unusual anomaly in the 1865 half penny.  I bring it to your attention out of respect to the principle of the group to improve our knowledge.   In four examples collected since 2024 the colons are I assume then the die differs from any I have seen since I've been collecting.  The colons are not rounded but square/diamond shaped.  The closest similar colons exist on the Canadian bronze coins.  I'm sure someone else must have noticed this but I can find no other references to this.  I have it in coins which are EF to fine and in each case the arrangement of the colons is I think the same. 

I will post pictures if anyone is interested.  

Edited 5 hours ago by DrLarry

[absence of uniformity]

3 hours ago, DrLarry said:

In the past few months I have been working on the identification of an unusual anomaly in the 1865 half penny.  I bring it to your attention out of respect to the principle of the group to improve our knowledge.   In four examples collected since 2024 the colons are I assume then the die differs from any I have seen since I've been collecting.  The colons are not rounded but square/diamond shaped.  The closest similar colons exist on the Canadian bronze coins.  I'm sure someone else must have noticed this but I can find no other references to this.  I have it in coins which are EF to fine and in each case the arrangement of the colons is I think the same. 

I will post pictures if anyone is interested.  

Attached image is a 1861 HP.

Edited 3 hours ago by absence of uniformity

[absence of uniformity]

I noticed on this halfpenny the features detailed in the attached image. I know its not B/R but I was still interested to identify the possible cause/reason.

[DrLarry]

15 minutes ago, absence of uniformity said:

Attached image is a 1861 HP.

Have you posted this in order to make a comment if so you seem to have not made one 

[absence of uniformity]

4 minutes ago, DrLarry said:

Have you posted this in order to make a comment if so you seem to have not made one 

Im making you aware I have seen the same feature on a 1861 Halfpenny.

[DrLarry]

Oh yes on occasions I have seen it but nothing resembles this . I have a least 1000 1861 half pennies i always look to see if anomalies are accidental.  A strike to a round edge flatens tht normal colon.  But in the 65 the square is consistent.   

[DrLarry]

Each of these is a different half penny 1865 the col9ns are completely different to the normal 1865 obverse and those found associated with the two types of 1865/3.

[Peckris 2]

As the square colons are both consistent and global, they're clearly not accidental. In the absence of any knowledge from forum members, Michael Gouby would be your next port of call.

[DrLarry]

18 minutes ago, Peckris 2 said:

As the square colons are both consistent and global, they're clearly not accidental. In the absence of any knowledge from forum members, Michael Gouby would be your next port of call.

Certainly they are deliberate i was surprised to find the pattern and position consistent in even the fine i have.  I will contact Michael I just thought I would ask forum members if they had or had not seen this obverse type first. 

[Coinery]

47 minutes ago, DrLarry said:

A strike to a round edge flatens tht normal colon.  But in the 65 the square is consistent.   

I don’t quite follow you? Doesn’t Richard also have a halfpenny site, have you taken a look on there?

[DrLarry]

38 minutes ago, Coinery said:

I don’t quite follow you? Doesn’t Richard also have a halfpenny site, have you taken a look on there?

Colons on every British half penny are struck round with a round punch.  All four examples have square colons the square/diamond punch is placed consistently.  The colons are unique to these 4 examples.  The only other examples of a square colon set is the 1864 Canadian half cent. 

[Coinery]

Interesting…as Peckris suggests, then!

I found Richard’s halfpenny site, I can’t see that it specifically mentions square/diamond colons? I would’ve expected to find it there if it was a known thing!

 https://halfpennyvarieties.wordpress.com/home-page-recreated/

[DrLarry]

55 minutes ago, Coinery said:

I don’t quite follow you? Doesn’t Richard also have a halfpenny site, have you taken a look on there?

Yes of course this obverse was used in half pennies up to 1870s but it has never had square colons 

Edited 41 minutes ago by DrLarry

[DrLarry]

2 minutes ago, Coinery said:

Interesting…as Peckris suggests, then!

I found Richard’s halfpenny site, I can’t see that it specifically mentions square/diamond colons? I would’ve expected to find it there if it was a known thing!

 https://halfpennyvarieties.wordpress.com/home-page-recreated/

It's very easy to fall into a habit of glancing at something knowing what to expect only to realise it's a very different beast. 

[DrLarry]

The only variant on the point rotation of each of the corners occurs on one where the side points to the middle of the two leaves after DG on three others the corner points directly into the two leaves.  But this could be a repair but that then would suggest the same punch was used sometime after the initial " error " which seems very unlikely.  The rotation of the others are consistent.