Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Interesting listing on Ebay

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Mega-Rare-1876-without-the-H-Victoria-Penny-in-very-nice-grade-FREEMAN-ND-p1/312207155131?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649

listed as 1876 no H penny, k

Gouby illustrates one from the Bamford collection, but states it was regarded by him as die fill

Are any known?

Edited by davidrj
Posted

David - to the best of my knowledge, literally all 1876 pennies were minted by Heatons. So Gouby is probably right when he says die fill for those which appear to be no H. 

  • Like 1
Posted

That was my understanding too.

 

Posted

All references to it that I am aware of also consider it a filled die..... Not a true no H...

That being said,  consider the classic example of the so called 1922 "plain" Lincoln cent (US)...  They were only struck at the Denver mint and should have a D mintmark ... However due to a filled die we now have a 1922 WEAK D and the rare 1922 PLAIN....

This example gives credence to the theory that it is merely a filled die.....

Its rarity and value will be determined by market demand....

 

Posted

I have always considered the 1882 Jamaican CuNi penny without an H to be similar, inconceivable that the mint would produce then in the middle of its refurbishment to split a total Mintage of 48,000

Posted

To me the latter looks a bit different and the "London" 1882 Jamaica pennies I seem to be able to spot even when worn. Haven't worked out the technical bits on that (got one off ebay for 20 USD)....

Posted

I think the real answer to this is the price being asked - £199 for a possibly unique coin? I'd say "chancer" myself.

Posted
2 hours ago, Peckris 2 said:

I think the real answer to this is the price being asked - £199 for a possibly unique coin? I'd say "chancer" myself.

I agree, and the marks below the date do suggest that the H was once there, or is very weakly struck.  I suspect it would be clearer in the hand.

Jerry

  • Like 1
Posted

Many years ago when still a bit green I bought an alleged 1876 No H penny, sold as such, and for all the world looked like it was (pictures attached), but when held at a slant to the light the H was definitely visible.....beware tricks of the light! 🧐

1876 No H Rev.jpg

1876 No H Date .jpg

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 8/6/2018 at 11:10 AM, PWA 1967 said:

Looking at the picture of just the date it looks like an unbarred H to me.

Absolutely agreed.

 

Posted

You can tell from the way the date sits in the top 2/3 of the exergue - in other words there is the space below where the H sat.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test