1949threepence Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 38 minutes ago, PWA 1967 said: Its been on the forum before Mike with close up pictures of the date Bernie's wasn't it, Pete? Quote
azda Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 20 minutes ago, 1949threepence said: Bernie's wasn't it, Pete? Not sure it was, Bernies was near UNC if i remember correctly Quote
PWA 1967 Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 1 hour ago, 1949threepence said: Bernie's wasn't it, Pete? No Mike the same coin that sold at LCA. Quote
1949threepence Posted November 27, 2016 Posted November 27, 2016 1 hour ago, PWA 1967 said: No Mike the same coin that sold at LCA. Cheers Pete. Quote
1949threepence Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 On 11/27/2016 at 5:43 PM, azda said: Not sure it was, Bernies was near UNC if i remember correctly Bernie's can be seen here Dave. Finally found it. Not quite UNC, but certainly a superior specimen for this exceedingly rare variety. Quote
VickySilver Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Please see the Gerald Jackson (ex-Spink) specimen that is by far the best I have seen. Quote
1949threepence Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 7 hours ago, VickySilver said: Please see the Gerald Jackson (ex-Spink) specimen that is by far the best I have seen. Where can that Gerald Jackson specimen be looked up, VS? Quote
Guest Sam_guest041 Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 NGC MS64 RB https://www.spink.com/press-releases/spink-to-auction-part-ii-of-the-gerald-w-jackson-collection-of-british-pennies.aspx# 2 Quote
azda Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Had to increase the size from 23kb, hopefully it still looks ok Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 It was a fantastic collection of which can be viewed on line. Think Gary (Jac) bought a few and the 1871 was mint Quote
VickySilver Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 I knew many of these would go for a song but was strapped at time of sale though did get the 1869 that was much better than the pictures.. Quote
Coppers Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, VickySilver said: I knew many of these would go for a song but was strapped at time of sale though did get the 1869 that was much better than the pictures.. I've heard that most of the pennies in that sale were better than the pictures. Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 Fantastic collection Mark and yes your probably right and one of the reasons some were good buys. As rare as the above coin is rare looks cleaned from the picture and a variety i would not buy . If its been worked on would cast a doubt Quote
1949threepence Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 1 hour ago, Guest Sam_guest041 said: With the coin being in such excellent condition, you can quite clearly see there is definitely a no H. Plus, of course, it's the right die pairing. Quote
VickySilver Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 As I said the picture does not do it justice, and it appeared ORIGINAL & not tampered with. I vote it a truly great coin - probably will ever regret not being able to get it. Quote
Coppers Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 The coin that I recall from that sale was the 1908 matte proof penny. Should have bid, but didn't. Quote
secret santa Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Finally picked up an 1853 Plain trident with italic 5. 1 Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Also apears to be the dot on Gratia variety I am sure someone will confirm ,have you got a picture of the reverse Richard please ?. Quote
alfnail Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Pete / Richard, the dot between the I and A of GRATIA has always been present on all 3 examples of this PT italic 5 type which I have ever owned. Attached are pictures of the example retained in my own collection. 1 Quote
alfnail Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 It is also interesting that the exact same 'dot' obverse seems to have been paired with an OT reverse. Close examination of the location of the date numerals, in particular the protrusion top left of the 5 which appears to be part of an underneath 5, give me confidence that I have correctly identified this to be the case..........date picture attached for information...........which appears to be a slight variation of Gouby Style Ab. Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 Your the expert on these Ian and have not got mine to hand , will have to check Maybe John (CHINGFORD) will confirm Quote
secret santa Posted December 2, 2016 Posted December 2, 2016 5 hours ago, PWA 1967 said: I am sure someone will confirm ,have you got a picture of the reverse Richard please ?. Your wish is my command..... Quote
Guest Sam_guest041 Posted December 3, 2016 Posted December 3, 2016 Shill bidding or is this really worth something THE COIN'S LINK Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.