pies

Explains alot

Has that seller had a previous name something to do with cottages

Lordy Lord, you penny collectors! We are not all like that

happy birthday,

Auction 56. 7 May 2008 http://www.baldwin.co.uk/auction-56/

Only found this http://www.napoleonicmedals.org/coins/bhm-454-2.htm Baldwins sold some 3045 http://www.baldwin.co.uk/media/cms/auction-archive/auction-56/Naval%20&%20Maritime%20Medals.pdf

I never use it, just use the saleroom

What about BNJ's ?

Has anybody got an old receipt with a tracking number on, if so can they enter it into the RM website and see if it recognises it

Providing you've got proof of postage and/or the signature obtained upon delivery the only claim would be "Not as described" and I'm not sure how someone could claim it was 179 days before they noticed it wasn't as described without PayPal suspecting something fishy. The concept of retaining evidence for half a year would be mind boggling for the casual seller as opposed to any business which would keep receipts as a matter of course. So the question for them is how they store the evidence of delivery. Does the PO keep signatures for 6 months or is it less?As to the 180 day ruling, Paypal would adopt the same attitude as with something bought the day before - and then decide in favour of the buyer. Taken from RM website "Claims for loss must be made within 80 calendar days of the date of posting, or no claim will be entertained. Royal Mail has no legal liability for any loss if at the time of the claim 80 days has expired from the date of posting. Royal Mail advises customers to claim as soon as possible after an event has occurred to enable enquiries to be made promptly." Basically your f****d

You want the Churchill thread for that

Easy the 1818 . I think it's obvious why

Six months FFS!!!!

Got some pics

nearly me

From what I have seen over the short time I have been collecting coins is that the royal mints quality control has been and still is very poor

Un researched means either "we looked but it wasn't as valuable as we thought" or " its fake"

Really http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Midland-Bank-Money-Bag-Pre-1999-HSBC-Bank-/191164128445?pt=UK_Coins_OtherBritish_RL&hash=item2c82451cbd

Surely if the mint were trialing a new portrait they would use either a blank die for the reverse or a proper reverse to see how the pair of dies worked together. I can't think why they would use two portrait dies together. Also i think the obverse and reverse dies were physically different so they would work in the presses

It sold for £4.5k plus commission

I would not clean it any more

And here are the rest http://www.britnumsoc.org/publications/Digital%20BNJ.shtml

Found this as well http://www.britnumsoc.org/publications/Digital%20BNJ/pdfs/1918_BNJ_14_8.pdf

Spooky i found that this morning

Nobody gets booted out for talking about coins, if they were i would be long gone