Peckris 2

Agreed. I do wonder about why this should be so? I'm thinking that Heatons were the preferred subcontractor, having been used since the 1870s, so on one level you'd think they'd get the better selection of dies? But if there was no difference in the quality of obverse die sent to both, then it COULD be that the slight variation in metal used for blanks might be the reason? Every collector is probably aware of the reddish colour that KNs have when worn, compared to the brown/black appearance of H pennies.

You got an amazing bargain there Mike. In the old price guides, it used to go: 1919H 1918H then a gap to 1918KN 1919KN These days it's more likely to go: 1918H then a gap to 1919H 1918KN then another gap to 1919KN (Talking of EF and higher that is)

"DOS BESOS" translates as "two kisses". This is the reverse of a genuine gold coin: I suspect that someone has created an 'alternative' version to use a love token (perhaps)?

Yes, in top grades it now rivals the 18KN.

There's only one Rob on this forum! who is @Rob

Unrecorded:

Exactly what I thought when I got my 1930 halfcrown last year!

Agreed. I couldn't see anything - outside my imagination - that might have suggested an overdate.

That's nuts.

Yet you would think - it being such a major rarity (especially in high grade) - that a reputable company would do their research? I mean, it's not rocket science.

Proofs are usually double struck to give a crisper and more defined finish. I'm not sure about specimens - perhaps single struck but using the same dies as proofs? Not sure.

THIS shows the ME, though the seller is at pains to say the image is not the coin to be supplied! But even an average circulated example for £2:95?? https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/194907491889?hash=item2d61644e31:g:sw4AAOSwWMBiKw~k

Perhaps he means the specimen?

That is NOT a ME - I can tell at first glance, even on worn examples. Surely, NGC should know better?

Agreed - I only have a few, and bought that one 1) because it was in a lot with other coins and 2) it's rather a fine design.

Good point. It was the same with 1951 Crowns in 2001.

Wow. I bought that for a fairly modest price 20 odd years ago, certainly nowhere near 3 figures.

Ah yes, that's much more exaggerated than normal. However, I still think it's the strike not post-Mint.

Which medal was that - the large size of the one with Young Head on one side, and Old Head on the other?

Do you think the writers of Allo Allo were thinking of that? Capt. Hans Geering : Do you not see? That if you kill him with the pill from the till by making with it the drug in the jug, you need not light the candle with the handle on the gâteau from the château. René : Simple plots are always the best.

Are we on the same page? I'm remembering an episode of 'Allo 'Allo!

is that on the gateau for the chateau?

Thanks

Why are they calling you "Guy Fonquernie", Stuart?

@copper123 I don't suppose you remember Loving You Has Made Me Bananas, a 1978 hit for Guy Marks? For decades, I thought the lyric was Oh your red scarf matches your eyes / You close your cover before striking / Your father had to shit for the blues / Loving you has made me bananas Turns out it is "Your father had the shipfitter blues" @Debono I really can't see anything wrong with your farthing. It could be that the strike has exaggerated the profile (not uncommon with Geo V) and therefore sucked more metal away from the reverse than usual? But face on it looks normal, and so does the shot of it resting on a surface. The picture with the blue ruler is a bit weird but the blue reflection doesn't help.