Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) You should block out your name and adress on there Richard, I wouldn't trust the internet with it Great provenance for the coin though, thanks for sharing. Edited December 17, 2015 by Nordle11 1 Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Thanks MattI should have thought of that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Too late now I guess.R Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Thanks MattI should have thought of that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Too late now I guess.RFortunately I have moved since then - Phew Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) Ah, no harm no foul Edited December 17, 2015 by Nordle11 Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 I like how it was too late until you realised you no longer live there Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Delete your adress richard.How ? Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Sorry everyone posting at the same time Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) Delete your adress richard.How ?Edit the post, look to the right of the attachment and there is a 'delete' button. Then just upload another.EDIT: You need 'use full editor' to do it. Edited December 17, 2015 by Nordle11 Quote
PWA 1967 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Chris or tom will delete it if you pm them. Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Delete your adress richard.How ?Edit the post, look to the right of the attachment and there is a 'delete' button. Then just upload another.EDIT: You need 'use full editor' to do it.What is full editor ? Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 It's just the button that takes you to the screen you get that allows you to upload pictures as an attachment. One sec I'll screenshot it Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 (edited) First click edit and you'll see the first picture I've attached underneath the textbox.Then click the use full editor button and you can then delete your attachments (2nd pic) Edited December 17, 2015 by Nordle11 Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Don't know where to go to even click on edit !!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Try this for size.1. Click edit here in the thread2. then click full editor3. then delete the attachments Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 Sorry - there's no edit to click on - must be doing something wrong Quote
Nordle11 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 No you're OK, I think it is a site access thing because I know that Brian (bhx7) has the same problem with not being able to edit. I'd ask Tom to edit it as Pete says, then ask him to give you access too 1 Quote
Gary1000 Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 No you're OK, I think it is a site access thing because I know that Brian (bhx7) has the same problem with not being able to edit. I'd ask Tom to edit it as Pete says, then ask him to give you access too Th edit function is time sensitive so has likely disappeared 1 Quote
Chris Perkins Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 I've deleted the attachment with the address. You may want to censor that part and re-attach. Quote
secret santa Posted December 17, 2015 Posted December 17, 2015 ]Thanks Chris, I'll reattach Michael's letter for those that are interested. 2 Quote
secret santa Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Yes, VIP sets are issued in very small numbers indeed and entirely separate from regular proof sets (though presumably indistinguishable under normal circumstances, e.g. 1937, 1950, 1951, except for case of issue).We should assume that F244 was not ONLY from a VIP set (though may have been in them?) but was a trial striking : maybe it was originally intended for issue, but then rejected, and therefore like F243A should be regarded as a pattern.As F244 is (now) a pattern mule, I would have thought it likely that BP 1953 L is also a pattern. It may be that F244 / BP 1953 L (is there any difference between them??) was intended for currency and therefore struck as proofs for the VIP set. Later it was decided that a further change was desirable and therefore the beaded reverse appeared, and was included in the regular proof and specimen sets. I would guess that BP 1953 N was experimental - i.e. a true pattern - and probably after the toothed reverse was rejected, i.e. probably between those and the beaded reverse.I believe the table below accurately lists the various 1953 pennies: Date Gouby Freeman Description rarity die pair name die pair no. 1953 A+a BP1953K 1*+D F243A Toothed obverse & reverse R9 1953 B+a - 1+A - Beaded obverse/toothed reverse Mule - Not proof R9 1953 B+b BP1953A 1+B F245 Circulation issue N 1953 C+a BP1953L - - Matt proof sold in April 1985 R9 1953 C+b BP1953P 1+B F246 Bronze proof R5 1953 C+b - 1+B - Matt proof (for photographic purposes) R9 1953 B+a BP1953M 1+A F244 From the V.I.P.proof set (Mule) R9 1953 B+x BP1953N - - Circulation obverse; toothless reverse PU 1953 C*+b BP1953R - - Pattern obverse (122 beads)/toothed reverse Mule R9 The only coin I haven't seen pictured is the coin defined as BP1953L (Matt proof) sold in April 1985.The Proof coin in the VIP set is interesting because not only is it a mule with toothed reverse, it also has the obverse design used on circulation pennies (121 beads; A of ELIZABETH points to tooth) rather than that used in the standard proof sets (120 beads; A of ELIZABETH points to gap). The coin sold by Spink in Dec 2014 was BP1953R. 1 Quote
secret santa Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Yes, VIP sets are issued in very small numbers indeed and entirely separate from regular proof sets (though presumably indistinguishable under normal circumstances, e.g. 1937, 1950, 1951, except for case of issue).We should assume that F244 was not ONLY from a VIP set (though may have been in them?) but was a trial striking : maybe it was originally intended for issue, but then rejected, and therefore like F243A should be regarded as a pattern.As F244 is (now) a pattern mule, I would have thought it likely that BP 1953 L is also a pattern. It may be that F244 / BP 1953 L (is there any difference between them??) was intended for currency and therefore struck as proofs for the VIP set. Later it was decided that a further change was desirable and therefore the beaded reverse appeared, and was included in the regular proof and specimen sets. I would guess that BP 1953 N was experimental - i.e. a true pattern - and probably after the toothed reverse was rejected, i.e. probably between those and the beaded reverse.I believe the table below accurately lists the various 1953 pennies: DateGoubyFreeman Description raritydie pairnamedie pairno.1953A+aBP1953K1*+DF243AToothed obverse & reverseR91953B+a-1+A-Beaded obverse/toothed reverse Mule - Not proofR91953B+bBP1953A1+BF245Circulation issueN1953C+aBP1953L--Matt proof sold in April 1985R91953C+bBP1953P1+BF246Bronze proofR51953C+b-1+B-Matt proof (for photographic purposes)R91953B+aBP1953M1+AF244From the V.I.P.proof set (Mule)R91953B+xBP1953N--Circulation obverse; toothless reversePU1953C*+bBP1953R--Pattern obverse (122 beads)/toothed reverse MuleR9The only coin I haven't seen pictured is the coin defined as BP1953L (Matt proof) sold in April 1985.The Proof coin in the VIP set is interesting because not only is it a mule with toothed reverse, it also has the obverse design used on circulation pennies (121 beads; A of ELIZABETH points to tooth) rather than that used in the standard proof sets (120 beads; A of ELIZABETH points to gap). The coin sold by Spink in Dec 2014 was BP1953R.Oh dear, I pasted a Word table in but it hasn't come out properly - I'll try again. Ignore the above Quote
secret santa Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 My second attempt to list the various 1953 penny types: 1 Quote
bhx7 Posted December 19, 2015 Posted December 19, 2015 Thanks Richard. That is something I will be downloading and adding to my reference info. Hope that is OK.CheersBrian Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.