Peckris Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 I was going to reply with we live in a democratice country and not a dictatorship, but i'll have to rethink that oneI think you will find we are a constitutional monarchy that pretends to be a democracyWe have a constitution? The Magna Carta is about as close as your going to likely get.True, true. Though what most people forget is that the old Carta was drawn up BY the barons, FOR the barons, AGAINST the crown - plebs like us weren't even in the frame. Quote
HistoricCoinage Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Alex Salmond to replace the Queen on new Scottish pound coin http://bit.ly/1msi1B2 Quote
Nordle11 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) Alex Salmond to replace the Queen on new Scottish pound coin http://bit.ly/1msi1B2 Haha I saw that too, loving the frumpy side-on shot of his face I love how they've gone one step extra and say it's being funded by Sean Connery, seriously, we aren't that brain dead! Edited April 1, 2014 by Nordle11 Quote
DaveG38 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 And the laugh is that because it's April Fools Day everyone thinks this is a joke........ Quote
Nordle11 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 And the laugh is that because it's April Fools Day everyone thinks this is a joke........ Is that some sort of April fools of an April fools? Quote
DaveG38 Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 And the laugh is that because it's April Fools Day everyone thinks this is a joke........ Is that some sort of April fools of an April fools?No, I'm sure the Salmond would love to be seen as King Alexander IV! Quote
azda Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 Salmond said he would immediately reaignif Scotland won their independence back, so his image would definately not be on the coimage.perhaps the famois Churchill 2 finger salute would be more appropriate, we could optimise the space on the coin with just 1 finger perhaps Quote
Rob Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Salmond said he would immediately reaignif Scotland won their independence back, so his image would definately not be on the coimage.perhaps the famois Churchill 2 finger salute would be more appropriate, we could optimise the space on the coin with just 1 finger perhaps Wot. You mean his position would be untenable? So he's just campaigning on behalf of Sean Connery? Quote
azda Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 No Rob, he's also campaigning for the 4 Million polish immigrants Quote
Rob Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 No Rob, he's also campaigning for the 4 Million polish immigrantsDoesn't makes sense for him to resign unless he wants to wash his hands of the whole affair after he's bu**ered up the Union.4 million Polish immigrants? They'll soon be the majority ethnic block in Scotland at that rate. Scotland will be a nation of plumbers - useful for curing the financial leakage. Quote
azda Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) If i'm not mistaken, it was always going to be the case as he states that his work would be done, i say it would only have just begun. The finicial leakage would be from England surely with a rather large tax hole to fill as it won't come from Scotland, this is why Westminster is sweating, because its going to Have to plug a large defecit and taxing an already exhausted population won't go down well Edited April 1, 2014 by azda Quote
Rob Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 It's a difficult one to call. Scotland has a greater %age of government handouts than England so there would be less drain on finances as a result. England wouldn't get the oil revenues, but would retain the gas ones roughly speaking. The practicalities are more problematic than the posturing. The banking system will be in a greater mess than it is now.Plus, if Scotland gets independence then Labour would lose its benficial skew to the voting system in Westminster which would definitely help England's finances longterm as it is doubtful they could form a government, let alone spend taxpayers money in a carefree manner as they are currently wont to do. The cost of politics won't reduce as there are too many vested interests in every country to maintain the gravy train that is political favour.My son is looking forward to a border at Gretna as it makes it easier for him to spend days out the country. Quote
scottishmoney Posted April 3, 2014 Posted April 3, 2014 I am thinking that a portrait should be of a hystorical figger: Quote
Peckris Posted April 3, 2014 Posted April 3, 2014 I am thinking that a portrait should be of a hystorical figger: I suppose Mel Gibson is now a historical figure - it seems ages since he made a film Quote
scottishmoney Posted April 3, 2014 Posted April 3, 2014 I am thinking that a portrait should be of a hystorical figger: I suppose Mel Gibson is now a historical figure - it seems ages since he made a film It has been ages since he has been mentally competent enough to complete a film. Curiously enough he doesn't live but a few hundred metres from Britney Spears and Justin Bieber. Must be something in the water. Quote
scottishmoney Posted April 3, 2014 Posted April 3, 2014 hystorical, historical or hysterical?Deliberate innuendo. Quote
Peckris Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 I am thinking that a portrait should be of a hystorical figger: I suppose Mel Gibson is now a historical figure - it seems ages since he made a film It has been ages since he has been mentally competent enough to complete a film. Curiously enough he doesn't live but a few hundred metres from Britney Spears and Justin Bieber. Must be something in the water. Quote
azda Posted April 4, 2014 Author Posted April 4, 2014 Here you go Girls and boys, some more light reading for you allhttp://wingsoverscotland.com/the-historical-debt/ Quote
copper123 Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 England on its own is not really bothered about scottish independance.it has plundered most of their oil and gas and can now depend on fracking in the outbacks of yorkshire and lancashire to pay the bills in westminster Quote
DaveG38 Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 King Alexander IV?The last Scottish king of this name was Alexander III. He was the last king of the House of Dunkeld and reigned from 1249 to 1286, and was, surprise, surprise the son of Alexander II. So, Mr Salmond would become Alexander IV - sounds better than King Salmond I, with Queen Sturgeon alongside him. Quote
azda Posted April 5, 2014 Author Posted April 5, 2014 (edited) King Alexander IV?The last Scottish king of this name was Alexander III. He was the last king of the House of Dunkeld and reigned from 1249 to 1286, and was, surprise, surprise the son of Alexander II. So, Mr Salmond would become Alexander IV - sounds better than King Salmond I, with Queen Sturgeon alongside him.Not sure why you'd think a commoner would become a King Dave, i'm sure IF Scotland were to gain independence whoever was the Leader of said Independent country would certainly not become a King or Queen, perhaps president, but certainly not royalty. Edited April 5, 2014 by azda Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.