Lotad Posted August 23, 2018 Posted August 23, 2018 I picked this up from a local dealer who had a stall at an antiques barn. Having looked in the coin grading book (the one in the banner above) I think it would grade as EF. What do you all think? I paid £13, which, according to the CCGB 2018 book (the one in the banner) is about right. This was my first purchase of a pre-decimal coin and I'm very happy with it. Also, that black smudge by the L of half, can I do anything to remove that, or is it best to leave it be? Quote
Nick Posted August 23, 2018 Posted August 23, 2018 Looks better than EF to me. You could try a drop of ethanol to see if the black mark will shift, don't rub it though - just dab it dry. 2 Quote
Peckris 2 Posted August 23, 2018 Posted August 23, 2018 I'd concur with Nick - the reflections suggest full lustre? The slightly flat top lion could be die wear. 1 Quote
Lotad Posted August 24, 2018 Author Posted August 24, 2018 (edited) Thanks, so would the next grade be A.UNC? I think it has full lustre, but I can only compare, in person, to worn/circulated ones and this one looks miles better. Edited August 24, 2018 by Lotad Quote
1949threepence Posted August 24, 2018 Posted August 24, 2018 On the basis of the pics, I'd go for GEF/aUNC. The reverse looks slightly better than the obverse. Nice coin. 1 Quote
Peckris 2 Posted August 24, 2018 Posted August 24, 2018 10 hours ago, Lotad said: Thanks, so would the next grade be A.UNC? I think it has full lustre, but I can only compare, in person, to worn/circulated ones and this one looks miles better. Anyone who can confidently differentiate between GEF and AUnc should be wearing a red cape and dating Lois Lane. Quote
VickySilver Posted August 25, 2018 Posted August 25, 2018 Here are some key obverse areas you may already know: Brow ridge Mustache edge Cheekbone - this is notorious for marks, even moreso on the crown coin Both top and bottom of ear On the reverse: IMO, the lions are not the key. Rather, the shield edge Rim edge and border teeth (goes for obverse as well) IMO, this would make it into the uncirculated with minimal bag marks. The obverse rim at 10-11 o'clock a bit rough and possible rim tap at 1 o'clock 1 Quote
ozjohn Posted August 26, 2018 Posted August 26, 2018 (edited) Agreed. The price was pretty good as well. My 1929 half crown ( already shown ) on this forum cost more. Not that I regret as it was a nice coin. I can remember Peckris suggesting that I dip this coin. Still a work in progress. You would tink it would be easy to find a decent 1929 halfcrown but when it came down to it there was little choice at a reasonable price. For example when I was looking there was a slabbed 1929 halfcrown offered for more than $US 300 Edited August 26, 2018 by ozjohn More info. Quote
VickySilver Posted August 31, 2018 Posted August 31, 2018 "Ah, Grasshopper, be patient." I remember the show Kung Fu with David Carradine.... One (1929) will show up at a lot LESS than 300 USD I would imagine. Have you looked through the pages of Coin and Medal News? Coins like this John Welsh used to have for many years - not sure if he is still about. I wouldn't have used him for more expensive issues however. Quote
rpeddie Posted September 1, 2018 Posted September 1, 2018 my time to shine 😀 i cannot justify why but i have an unreasonable amount of these halfcrowns(About 65 in UNC from 1928-1936) this one looks good and i agree with the others at AUNC, some edge nicks bringing it down a little bit. Tough to picture these with their true colour, from what i see ifs reasonable purchase at £13 Quote
Nick Posted September 1, 2018 Posted September 1, 2018 Here's my 1929 halfcrown, which IIRC cost about £30. 1 Quote
Sleepy Posted September 1, 2018 Posted September 1, 2018 My 1928 Half Crown the reverse is almost AUNC but the obverse is nowhere near as nice, but it only cost £12.50 last year. 1 Quote
VickySilver Posted September 1, 2018 Posted September 1, 2018 LOL Well, dipped in any case but I don't see wear as much as bag marks. Quote
Lotad Posted September 1, 2018 Author Posted September 1, 2018 Thank you for the replies everyone. How do you identify if one has been dipped, like Sleepy's? Quote
Sleepy Posted September 1, 2018 Posted September 1, 2018 The grade of my HC I shall bow down to the more knowledgeable within the forum, however the coin IMO is not dipped, despite what the best efforts of my really rubbish picture show. I would say it still has just about full luster judging from the cartwheel effect the coin displays when held under a glancing light. Quote
VickySilver Posted September 2, 2018 Posted September 2, 2018 The reason that I offer that opinion is that the surfaces are without the oxidation/toning of even a minimal sort that one would expect to see on a coin 90 years old.Or at least very little. Also even though the coin is base 0.500 silver and it is just seeing it from the photo, there is just that little bit of loss of lustre that one sees on a freshly minted coin or that can be seen under the light [usually] yellow to brown toning. I have a very nice set that I put in a Capitol Plastics Holder (done custom) and I did used to lightly ip many of my coins including some in that holder. PM me if you'd like pictures sent in an email... Quote
ozjohn Posted September 3, 2018 Posted September 3, 2018 On 8/31/2018 at 11:51 PM, VickySilver said: and in "Ah, Grasshopper, be patient." I remember the show Kung Fu with David Carradine.... One (1929) will show up at a lot LESS than 300 USD I would imagine. Have you looked through the pages of Coin and Medal News? Coins like this John Welsh used to have for many years - not sure if he is still about. I wouldn't have used him for more expensive issues however. It seems that 1935 & 1936 half crowns are far more plentiful than 1928 and 1929 issues and in better condition even though the mintage figures are greater for the earlier issues. As for $US300 for a slabbed 1929 it's crazy. The coins issued in the middle years, with the exception of 1939 & 1934 are fairly plentiful as well again perhaps not quite so easy to obtain in top condition. Quote
Rob Posted September 3, 2018 Posted September 3, 2018 1 hour ago, ozjohn said: It seems that 1935 & 1936 half crowns are far more plentiful than 1928 and 1929 issues and in better condition even though the mintage figures are greater for the earlier issues. As for $US300 for a slabbed 1929 it's crazy. The coins issued in the middle years, with the exception of 1939 & 1934 are fairly plentiful as well again perhaps not quite so easy to obtain in top condition. Is that more plentiful in Oz, or worldwide? I would have said they were slightly more common than the 35 coins, but possibly a reasonable number of 36s were set aside following the King's death? Quote
ozjohn Posted September 3, 2018 Posted September 3, 2018 With the introduction of Australian coins in 1910 the halfcrown ceased to be issued as halfcrowns were not included in the new issues although halfcrowns circulated into the early 1930s but these for the most part would have been the earlier ones. So in answer to your question 1928 etc. halfcrowns were never plentiful in Australia. As for availability of the 1929 halfcrown it was based entirely on my attempt to upgrade the one I had as it seemed difficult at the time to find a top grade example. Quote
Peckris 2 Posted September 3, 2018 Posted September 3, 2018 11 hours ago, ozjohn said: With the introduction of Australian coins in 1910 the halfcrown ceased to be issued as halfcrowns were not included in the new issues although halfcrowns circulated into the early 1930s but these for the most part would have been the earlier ones. So in answer to your question 1928 etc. halfcrowns were never plentiful in Australia. As for availability of the 1929 halfcrown it was based entirely on my attempt to upgrade the one I had as it seemed difficult at the time to find a top grade example. Certainly in Britain the 1936 (as usual, following the Abdication) is the most common. 1928 and 1929 are plentiful too, being first two years of essentially the first new reverse since 1902. 1935 I would say next, though not very different from 1931 and 1933 also. 1932 is the third hardest, though quite a bit easier than 1934, and 1930 the hardest. (I'm talking high grades here - none are rare in low grades not even 1930.) Quote
ozjohn Posted September 4, 2018 Posted September 4, 2018 Like I said I was surprised to find at the time difficulty in obtaining a top grade 1929 halfcrown given the mintage for this year was more than double that of the 1935/36 issues. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.