Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

secret santa

Accomplished Collector
  • Posts

    2,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

Everything posted by secret santa

  1. Surprise, surprise - the 1862 over 1 has finally turned up at the buyer's house, over four and a half months late !
  2. Different coins for me, too. I've also compared the Colin Cooke pictures of yours and I think they are different.
  3. Michael now agrees that this 1889 wide date with the raised numeral 9 appears to be paired with obverse R (12) and should thus be reclassified as 1889Ad. There is nothing to preclude this reverse from being paired with obverse S but there don't seem to be any confirmed examples.
  4. A wood louse is called a "cheeselog" in my neck of the woods. It seems to be quite local to South Oxfordshire, unless you know better.
  5. The website says £70 but I wrote £35 into the catalogue at the time - spooky !
  6. I have just sent Pete's and Ian's pictures to Michael for his comments.
  7. I called it Cd straight from Michael's book (without noticing that he had it as S+r) and obverse R because it was sold as obv 12 (R) in Colin Cooke's catalogue (lot 107) for the Tony Crocker sale. I probably never bothered to check the obverse but, as you say, it is so worn as to make it unidentifiable. I will now change it on the basis of the above information - many thanks.
  8. Could you put the reverse up please Pete - I'd like to include this on my varieties website as illustration.
  9. It definitely appears more human
  10. The customer base for these sorts of coins must be incredibly small ???
  11. That's a great price and it's interesting that 2 bidders bid it up that high. Wonder who bought it ? (KB ?)
  12. I've just seen a better example of the 1921 missing waves:
  13. Interesting but not to the tune of £100 !
  14. How long before forged "vaccination passports" are available on Ebay ?
  15. He has now removed the listing. I think it was an honest mistake but it's a pity he didn't check after our first polite interventions. All's well that ends well, though it leaves a few questions about Lockdale's declared results....... And I've just received this message from him: You were correct the item has been took down the correct one relisted later tonight. I am sorry for the confusion.
  16. I do believe that he has mixed his photos up unintentionally but has been unwilling to even consider that it might be his fault.
  17. When you look at Lockdale's catalogue for the auction, every item seems to have a "hammer price" suggesting that everything was sold, which is seemingly not the case. Presumably many of the "hammer prices" are actually the reserve, which was not met ? But it makes Lockdale's look like a very successful auction house. Is there anything we can believe nowadays ???
  18. He has now sent me a message admitting that he might have posted the wrong picture and will check it when he gets back into work on Monday. If so, I'll post details on here but it's no excuse for the foul-mouthed denials that he sent before checking his own work. Apparently, he's getting a lot of abuse so can I ask everyone to hang fire until we hear that he's made a genuine mistake.
  19. His response to me saying that he doesn't own it: "I do own it. Will you people please stop threatening me!" and he's blocked me. Time to bid £1000 on it I think and get him excited.
  20. I, too, have now sent him a message and look forward to an articulate and entertaining response.
  21. I've just done this although it didn't allow me to put in a narrative reason for reporting. I could only pick from lists of preset phrases.
  22. Beware this seller. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1854-Victoria-Penny-PT-AU-Lustre/254791108305?hash=item3b52bbc6d1:g:~aQAAOSwSAtfwMgr The penny he's selling is sitting at home with me as we speak. He's taken the photo from Lockdale's site and is offering it as his own.
  23. Looks a bit like yours, Pete.
×
×
  • Create New...
Test