Definitely. It's a shame that Cameron pointedly distanced himself from Thatcher, I think that lost him support from grassroots Tories. Although Thatcher did sell off state-run industries, she did so because there were loss making, and technically inefficient in a changing world. To keep them state-run would have created a larger burden on successive governments and the taxpayer. As I'm sure you know, protectionism never works - in part it caused the WSC in 1929. Isolating ourselves from Europe would be catastrophic economically, as the Europeans are our largest trading partner. The problem with protectionism is that other countries would reciprocate by putting tariffs on our goods, so we wouldn't be able to buy anything from abroad, nor would be be able to sell it. Now I'm all for self-sufficiency, but there are some things Britain can't make as cheaply as other countries. I would rather pay less money for a foreign car than pay more for a lesser-quality British one, such as the monstrosities made by British Leyland. Like you, I would be all for keeping the colonies, but I wouldn't want them if they were in a state like India in 1947. I also have something of a penchant for Victoria politics, however the only reason it was pro-heavy industry then was because it was the industry that made the most money for the treasury. In the 80s, that had switched to the service sector, so manufacturing jobs became less and less important. It all started going downhill when MPs got salaries and the Parliament Act was passed.