Rob

Because to invert the punch you would have to use the other side, i.e. the bit you hit with a hammer, so the repair would probably be a round or square blob a few mm in diameter depending on what it looks like - I don't know. It is pretty certain not to have an engraved inverted E on the bit you hit. If you rotate the working end it would place the bar on the right

Where would they get a reversed F punch from? If it was upside down the vertical would be on the right hand side of the character. More likely a broken E punch or an I with the arms entered separately.

The description is as you say. Probably a typo as the following item was an 1826 with the same description, which is a year for sets. I have a complete set of SNCs for the year if interested. It's illustrated.

An illusion

Sixpence 19mm dia, shilling just under 24

Those are shillings from when I used to collect shillings and halfpennies as denominations. All four were culled over the past 10 years when I refocused the collection. Although I don't have them any more, I thought they were pretty enough to include on the thread. Here's another, a Wiener pattern, ESC 1380.

A Wiener pattern shilling, ESC 1382

Quite a pleasing 1849 shilling

A few that have been culled to follow.

If you want any more fuel thrown on the fire, my F465A does have a frosted bust.

All the contradictions are generated by those who wish to have a proof designated VIP because suitably attributed coins would probably see a sudden increase in value. Everyone wants the rare coin rather than being content with a bog standard one - think about the number of people claiming to have a satin proof Churchill. Oddly enough, it is probably easier and cheaper to buy a regular 'VIP' proof from the non-set years, than a wishful thinking 'maybe it is' from 1937 or 1953 etc. The VIP label was always given as the rationale for the very low mintage proofs. As to where they went? Who knows. The mintage determined the exclusivity and so the phrase was coined. In the case of the toothed reverse penny, you do have a particularly rare variety, so their VIP attribution could well be a reflection of the people it was made for. The same might possibly be said for the Freeman 465A halfpenny. For an R14 I have seen precious few examples, and the picture on the link above does suggest the rim might be a bit thicker than normal.

People have been mixing and matching sets since they were made. Even if the original coins make up the set, there is no rule which stipulates they have to tone the same, nor whether they are frosted or not. People are still getting far too exercised over this VIP nonsense.

Do the legend punches match, or the datal figures? Can't tell from the images as they are too small, but Chris' image is good enough to compare.

probably should read NAF. Where are the fingers, or does hidden detail form part of the assigned grade? Helmet's flat, drapery's flat, clear date and the picture is devoid of relief. I think that's a dream on.

Yes he does. A truly dedicated student of the year.

Ah. Your's is considerably rarer. Aluminium was almost a precious metal in 1887, only having been made commercially available a couple years previously.

Yes. Came out of Baldwin's basement a few years ago. Actually, a bit more than a few by now.

Just trying to compose a talk on the chronology of the R42 restrike halfpennies to give to the club in 6 weeks time, so as the images were open I thought I would share.

And the reverse.

KH4 pattern halfpenny, P-.

You might. Designers will use anything to accentuate their pretentious crap.

Probably found in a hoard with the coin in the third picture

Or he has learned everything he knows from eBay. That's an eBay aUNC or even higher. It's blindingly obvious that most people haven't a clue when it comes to grading, so simply using someone else's grade for something in that condition is called market research.

Reading must be at least 5 miles from the auction. Surely you can't use that as an excuse. Regular trains, or a quick trip down the A329M