Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Si scusa pensavo non fosse stato pubblicato
  3. Yes, you posted it before. I replied, and now you've created this similar topic for no reason. Reply to this message please, or I'll have to assume that you're some kind of spammer or time-wasting bot.
  4. Sono così felice di questa moneta da 10 sterline!!😍😍
  5. Today
  6. Its totally blank on the other side Chris
  7. I ment farthings or halfpennies
  8. I think when the message comes up like that it is because the lot has been withdrawn or cancelled by Ebay. If it had sold it would show in the sold listings. I hope that is the case!
  9. Yesterday
  10. do you have pictures of the other side?
  11. An empty clothes rack? Nothing suspicious about that in my wardrobe
  12. I have one of those 1721 over 1720 - though in pretty awful condition. I think this is the second one I have had through my hands.
  13. 1721/0 is also quite scarce
  14. As there is no automated way of translating, I think you'd be better off posting in English Enzo. That appears to be a Freddie Mercury silver proof £5 (edit: £10). One of the Royal Mint's 'Music Legends' series. It might even be the one they are currently peddling.
  15. Closer picture 🙃
  16. Last week
  17. The 1200 dpi is for analyzing and comparing the punches and it's only just enough. Stu's scans are probably in the 600dpi range and is quite sufficient to compare the dies for now and hopefully there'll more sunlight in the future to get a close-up picture of the over date. 🙂
  18. Could you guys take a careful look at this big 36g lump of bronze carefully please 🙏 Totally flat back on it and all I can see is what seems to be a bull with rider facing right. Either that or the meds are too strong! Any info would be much appreciated, thanks in advance 👍
  19. Buonasera, cosa ne pensate di questa? Grazie a tutti
  20. Not my area, but I would agree. Leaving aside the details on the coin there are two other red flags: Brand new seller - this is his first sale; he has excluded the supposed grading details from the picture. Shows enough to make you think it has been officially graded but no company or registration info included. I hope no one falls for it.
  21. Looks a little suspicious to me... https://ebay.us/m/N6Cgr8
  22. It was more hardware limitations than digitally challenged. I was a computer technician & IT teacher in a previous life. Early 2000s anyway until approx 2009 . The scanner is from around 2015 so pretty old. My laptop died a few months ago but my daughter kindly gave me her old one which runs okay but everything seems to take forever with it. I upgraded the ram on it last year for her but it's not made much difference in regards to performance. Anyway i managed the scans , they where nowhere near 1200 dpi but they were adequate for what was needed. Stu.
  23. It's already sorted. I emailed them over yesterday. Stu.
  24. I often scan my pictures in at 350 and the quality is adequate for a 500k maximum size. Even when I have a 1200dpi scan, the image quality is only an issue if you want to keep the original at that level. By the time you have cropped it to the required size, the image often seems to have reduced to a smaller footprint than originally anticipated.
  25. 1200dpi in scanner terms is very intense. I think my coin scans were about 300dpi to get a reasonable size and good quality... ensure they are output as jpg files.
  26. 500k should normally be plenty for a decent sized image. The one below is just 161k (it doesn't have a lot of actual detail because it's a new modern coin, but even so).
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...
Test