Coinery Posted Tuesday at 02:01 PM Posted Tuesday at 02:01 PM (edited) Â https://auctions.cngcoins.com/lots/view/4-M8HXGK/hanover-victoria-1837-1901-ar-sixpence-dated-1887-pcgs-ms-64 Edited Tuesday at 02:15 PM by Coinery 2 Quote
Coinery Posted Tuesday at 04:04 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 04:04 PM 1 hour ago, copper123 said: less than EF Agreed! 1 Quote
Peckris 2 Posted Wednesday at 10:49 AM Posted Wednesday at 10:49 AM What is the American MS64 - our GVF? 2 Quote
Coinery Posted Wednesday at 11:51 AM Author Posted Wednesday at 11:51 AM 1 hour ago, Peckris 2 said: What is the American MS64 - our GVF? Apparently so! You’d normally expect to be ‘safe’ around those grades…staggeringly bad! 1 Quote
copper123 Posted Wednesday at 02:19 PM Posted Wednesday at 02:19 PM Coins of the year 1887 are really common, just be discerning and not in a rush, I must admit unc and a/unc are harder to find but they are out there don't fall for these con merchants 1 Quote
Peckris 2 Posted Wednesday at 03:58 PM Posted Wednesday at 03:58 PM 1 hour ago, copper123 said: Coins of the year 1887 are really common, just be discerning and not in a rush, I must admit unc and a/unc are harder to find but they are out there don't fall for these con merchants The 1887 shilling is arguably the most common Victorian coin, even in high grade - the sixpence is also very common but at least you have two types to collect.  Quote
copper123 Posted Wednesday at 06:50 PM Posted Wednesday at 06:50 PM And the threepence by far the most common victoria date Quote
coinkat Posted 58 minutes ago Posted 58 minutes ago I would not feel comfortable offering a grade opinion without seeing the coin in its entirety-including the reverse. Also, we are opining on a photograph which may or may not capture a realistic view of the coin. Grading standards across the pond are different and standards really should not be intermingled as that can be misleading. Quote
Coinery Posted 6 minutes ago Author Posted 6 minutes ago 43 minutes ago, coinkat said: I would not feel comfortable offering a grade opinion without seeing the coin in its entirety-including the reverse. Also, we are opining on a photograph which may or may not capture a realistic view of the coin. Grading standards across the pond are different and standards really should not be intermingled as that can be misleading. I wasn’t so much asking for a grade, just that it was a million miles off being an MS64, even if the reverse was FDC. I did include the link to the upcoming sale, where the reverse is available for viewing. Unfortunately, most people who will be bidding on the coin will only have the integrity of the grading company’s number and the images to back it up. Speaking only for myself, I think both are questionable. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.