Test Jump to content
The British Coin Forum - Predecimal.com

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello everyone,

I am looking for more information on the different types of proofs which were made for the 1960 British Exhibition Crown.

I would very much appreciate some confirmations from the experts in the forum.

1960.jpg.246a534465606f02c1387ecd527d29bb.jpg

 

My current understanding is the following:

  • The 80ies book on Crowns by Davies mentions three proofs: prooflike, vip proofs and even silver ones
  • The Royal Mint Report from that year makes no mention of any of that
  • Regarding the silver ones, the Royal Mint replied to my enquiry that "if it's not in the report it doesn't exist"
  • I could not find sales for the silver version. We have however VIP proofs which are not so infrequently sold
  • One sale on HA mentions proofs "patinated in Silver" for VIP version (Auction #3098 / Lot #33907)
  • No 1960 crowns were minted at the US exhibition (clearly stated in the Royal Mint report), they only minted the medals

So all in all:

  • Do Silver proofs exist or is the book by Davis mistaken?
  • Weren't "prooflike" ones already made from polished dies? So what are VIP ones.. super duper polished dies?
  • Are the VIP proofs made by "specially polished dies" or were they plated in silver?
  • In real life, are proof like vs vip ones visibly different? How so? Is it just the cameo effect?
  • Where does the "common knowledge" of the VIP proofs made from polished dies even come from?
  • Are the 30-50 vip vs 70000 prooflike figures validated by any reference/document?
  • And what about the Cameo/UltraCameo/VIP distinction -- is that just a split of the otherwise equal VIP population?

Thank you in advance for any info you will be able to share on this matter!

Edited by joe_77
  • Like 2
Posted

These are the relevant extracts from the Royal Mint Annual Report of 1960.

20250605_1.jpg

20250605_5.jpg

20250605_4.jpg

20250605_3.jpg

20250605_2.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I had to stitch the topic together with multiple messages because of the current tech issues with the forum. Unfortunately I'm not able to order the extracts from the Royal Mint properly (the two pieces about the Exhibition are inverted).

By the way, here's a similar discussion I started for completeness sake: https://goccf.com/t/479888

The interesting fact that emerged from that discussion is that the Davies book seems to suggest to "ping test" the Crowns to find the silver specimens. Kind of difficult when most of the VIPs are now probably slabbed. 

Thanks everyone!

Edited by joe_77
  • Like 1
Posted

Yea, that is a crazy number. This is RIGHT UP MY ALLEY, and I have NEVER seen an actual silver specimen.  Satin, PL and proofs of CuNi I have seen. IMHO, the latter is not rare enough to warrant the prices fetched and would downgrade the scarcity rating of this coin (VIP Record Proofs).

  • Like 1
Posted

The New York examples were struck on polished dies, hence prooflike. They're scarcer than the regular but not sure of the relative mintages.

Posted (edited)
On 7/18/2025 at 10:28 PM, VickySilver said:

Yea, that is a crazy number. This is RIGHT UP MY ALLEY, and I have NEVER seen an actual silver specimen.  Satin, PL and proofs of CuNi I have seen. IMHO, the latter is not rare enough to warrant the prices fetched and would downgrade the scarcity rating of this coin (VIP Record Proofs).

Hello, thank you for your reply! Could you clarify --- are you saying that you believe more VIP Proofs were minted as opposed to the 30-50 figure I find online OR do you believe the prices are too high for coins with a mintage of say 50? The 30k £ was top pop. Non-top pop specimens go for less, like 4-8k £. One just sold few minutes ago (PCGS PF63 CAM) at auction for 5k £.

9 hours ago, Peckris 2 said:

The New York examples were struck on polished dies, hence prooflike. They're scarcer than the regular but not sure of the relative mintages.

According to the Annual report we know for certain that 18.000 were brought to New York -- assuming they were all proof-like. Numista states 70.000 for the whole proof-like mintage; not sure where that figure is from. As far as VIP, I keep finding 30-50 online but again, no idea where that figure comes from!

7 hours ago, VickySilver said:

Should ask Mr. Steve Hill if he knows of silver 0.925 versions...

Is he on the forum? I shall write an email to him immidiately!

Edited by joe_77
Posted (edited)

Unless it's struck on a thinner flan, a sterling silver version would be about 15% heavier than the cupro-nickel version (from the specific gravity/density comparisons).

Edited by oldcopper
  • Like 1
Posted

Not that it is any more likely to be correct than any other source, but my old copy of Krause (38th edition dated 2010) reads:

1960 - 1,024,000
1960 Prooflike - 70,000
1960 Proof - 
Note VIP proof - 30-50 pieces

So that maybe where people are getting that figure. No figure against Proof suggests they have no data on that. They do not list Silver proof at all.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, joe_77 said:

Hello, thank you for your reply! Could you clarify --- are you saying that you believe more VIP Proofs were minted as opposed to the 30-50 figure I find online OR do you believe the prices are too high for coins with a mintage of say 50? The 30k £ was top pop. Non-top pop specimens go for less, like 4-8k £. One just sold few minutes ago (PCGS PF63 CAM) at auction for 5k £.

According to the Annual report we know for certain that 18.000 were brought to New York -- assuming they were all proof-like. Numista states 70.000 for the whole proof-like mintage; not sure where that figure is from. As far as VIP, I keep finding 30-50 online but again, no idea where that figure comes from!

Is he on the forum? I shall write an email to him immidiately!

S. Hill is at Sovereign Rarities.

Posted
20 hours ago, oldcopper said:

Unless it's struck on a thinner flan, a sterling silver version would be about 15% heavier than the cupro-nickel version (from the specific gravity/density comparisons).

Excellent point! This would also make an easy marker to distinguish between varieties so one would think a reference book would lead with this as opposed to a "ping test" ?

Is there any chance to get in touch with Mr. Davies to ask for clarification on this?

14 hours ago, VickySilver said:

S. Hill is at Sovereign Rarities.

I wrote to him yesterday; will update if I get a reply!

Posted

I was able to get a reply from Mr. Hill which I will summarise below. Many Thanks to Mr. Hill for his help!

Quote

[..] “VIP” Proof that has the lettering and design frosted with a nice cameo effect – nobody knows how many made! 
Krause indication is an estimate of how many exist which equates to what I have probably seen in commerce – maybe 20?

I have never seen a 0.925 silver version [..], the more recent publications do not list a silver proof version at all.

I note in the 1960s publication of Pattern and Proof Crown Size pieces by Linecar and Stone that they list a proof silver version as number 8 and cite the sale of one in Glendinings on 4th October 1962 lot 322 that sold for a massive £42 and was apparently “fine silver” which presumably means 0.999. Interestingly the same sale has one of the plain edge mistrikes in the next lot which sold for £58! - all bought by Spink.

I will try to get in touch with Spink on the matter!

  • Like 1
Posted

Thank you very much David, it sure does help!

Does anyone have the 1962 catalogue from Glendinings ? I'm trying to find also that for completeness sake. If none has it I might try to buy one or ask for help from one of the sellers!

Posted
40 minutes ago, joe_77 said:

Thank you very much David, it sure does help!

Does anyone have the 1962 catalogue from Glendinings ? I'm trying to find also that for completeness sake. If none has it I might try to buy one or ask for help from one of the sellers!

I do, but unfortunately it's not for sale. It doesn't give any more information (and neither for the pictured and succeeding lot 323 plain edged, bevelled rim type) than is quoted in L&S. I haven't got the prices realised, and there don't appear to be any estimates (either listed or with the entries) in the catalogue.

Posted

I was also able to get a better pic of the Davies book as to properly read the footnotes. Thanks to all the kind people who are helping out on this quest to get more info on these coins!

p2drlrdndeef1.jpg

Posted

Continuing the collection of reference material on the matter, here's from English Silver Coinage by Bull.
Footnote 3 states "Struck on polished dies for sale at the British Trade Exposition in New York".

1-bull.jpg

2-bull.jpg

Posted

The entry for 4337 in the 7th edition of Bull has been corrected to read "Struck in cupro-nickel".

  • Like 2
Posted

Last reference I found is from English Silver Crowns by Day. Footnotes 220 refers to the Annual Mint Report (which I shared earlier in the post) and 221 refers to the Communication to the author from the Libraria and Curator of the Royal Mint, dated April 25th 1961 (I shall find it and post it).

day1.jpg

day2.jpg

day3.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Your efforts are appreciated as I really do like the 20th century crowns and have followed them for many years. I would not necessarily take all of Davies or even Spink/ESC as gospel. They are good and informative bur I have found other errors or corrections. Again, I have never seen or had reliable information on a sterling 0.925 specimen. BTW, I used to be the main cataloguer for a major work.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...
Test