Mynki Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 As per my other thread really. Hypothetical question, of which I do have an interest though... If you were wanting to start a collection of victorian shillings, which years would be :- The most reasonable in terms of price? The easiest to find? The most desirable? Finally, how common are these in gEF and UNC? Quote
Mr T Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 1838 to 1901? 1887 is probably easy enough, like most other denominations of that year. Quote
VickySilver Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 Think I'd stick to the Young Heads, the Jubs and Widows just don't do anything for most people (well, me at least). The earlier Young Heads appear much more crisply executed - which they were - and are a lot more attractive. I suppose it comes down to a matter of budget, but some years are not all that dear: 1842, 1864, 1866, etc. Attractive and well preserved examples are out there. Might have to don a suit of armour to compete for the 1848/6s and 1850, 52, 54, 63, etc. in top grade. Quote
copper123 Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 I disagee the widow head shilling is a fine coin!! Only a personal opinion though Quote
Rob Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 28 minutes ago, VickySilver said: Might have to don a suit of armour to compete for the 1848/6s and 1850, 52, 54, 63, etc. in top grade. 51 maybe, but not 52 Quote
Paulus Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 21 minutes ago, copper123 said: I disagee the widow head shilling is a fine coin!! Only a personal opinion though Yes, I think the OH reverse is a splendid design, much prefer it to th YH reverses Quote
VickySilver Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 Oops, meant 1851 as the 1852 is one of the more common dates. Yikes! Quote
copper123 Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 MMMMMmmmmmmmdrools at that OH shilling! Quote
Mynki Posted February 12, 2016 Author Posted February 12, 2016 LC have a couple of '52's in stock now rated 82 and 85 but no pictures yet for either. Quote
Mr T Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 As for commonness, I've seen a number of young heads in VF-EF for sale lately so they're not out of reach (probably). Quote
Stuntman Posted February 12, 2016 Posted February 12, 2016 I really like the Widow Head shilling design too, on both sides of the coin. In fact I think the shilling, florin and halfcrown of that era are all lovely. 1883 is pretty reasonable in terms of price I think for a Young Head (4th Young Head). For the different types of Young Head in the lower grades that I tend to collect (VF to GVF), I have found that 1856, 1874 and 1883 have tended to be lower priced. I've never seen an 1839 WW so I suspect that 1838 is the lower priced option for the first Young Head? Quote
Paulus Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 1 hour ago, Stuntman said: In fact I think the shilling, florin and halfcrown of that era are all lovely Agreed! What's not to like about these designs! Each to his own of course ... Quote
jaggy Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Agree that those reverse designs are vey nice. However, for the obverse, I have always liked the YH better than the JH or OH. Quote
Mynki Posted February 13, 2016 Author Posted February 13, 2016 Yep, 1887 must surely be the most common. I've only found one 1850 for sale, not that I've tried hard to look. It's in poor condition and still out of my price range! Even if it wasn't I'm not sure I could justify the cost to myself. I appreciate they're very rare, but it's still just a Vicky shilling. Does anyone feel the same? I can see the attraction if it were in a high grade, but with so much detail gone it doesn't scream buy me... There is a CGS 82 graded 1859 on fleabay, the seller wants £510 for it. He quotes last years Spink quotation of £525 (They're £625 this year) but rather bemusingly, if you enter the UIN in CGS it values the coin at just £350, whilst the Rotagraphic book of collectors coins states £300 so I think he'll struggle to sell that. LC have an 85 graded 1859 shilling available at £450 too. Quote
VickySilver Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Please save yourself some quid and duck buying from the LC sales site - those are high. The 1859 is not rare either but can come very nice and almost proof-like. I will go ahead and hold out for the obverse of the Young Head earlier issues and they IMO are a lot more pleasing than Vick with that crazy Jub crown or the sour and dour Widow Head. I'll concede the reverse of the earlier shillings as being a bit plain, even of higher relief than the later bits... Quote
Mynki Posted February 13, 2016 Author Posted February 13, 2016 13 minutes ago, VickySilver said: Please save yourself some quid and duck buying from the LC sales site - those are high. The 1859 is not rare either but can come very nice and almost proof-like. I will go ahead and hold out for the obverse of the Young Head earlier issues and they IMO are a lot more pleasing than Vick with that crazy Jub crown or the sour and dour Widow Head. I'll concede the reverse of the earlier shillings as being a bit plain, even of higher relief than the later bits... Not bought any shillings from LC. I just mentioned them in relation to the very high price on ebay. The thread was really to discuss these coins and flesh out details, such as "1859 is not rare either but can come very nice and almost proof-like". I know there are a few Victorian silver coins that appear proof like, but are not actual proofs. What other shillings can be like this? I'll be looking out for more on DNW, Heritage ans LC auctions. If you know of any other good sources then please let me know. Thanks in advance Quote
VickySilver Posted February 13, 2016 Posted February 13, 2016 Interesting as I was just looking over my shillings to see if there were possible upgrades and see Proolike strikes on most years from 1838-1849 & then some more in the 1850s as well. Also, the 1880s and right on through the Jubs - some of those that have been listed as Record proofs from non-standard years such as 1889-91 IMO are not fully proof; nor are they substantially different or better from some of the PLs I've seen. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.