I have participated in another, mainly US, forum with regard to the issue of 'slabbing and grading' as opposed to 'raw'. My overriding impression is that, for many US collectors, the investment aspect is more important than the collecting aspect. In addition, many people do not have confidence in their own skills and knowledge. Typical comments include: "I like to have my Coins Graded. This way You know what Your getting" "there is little argument that it is almost unheard of for a counterfeit coin to get into a holder (PCGS or NGC) and rarely do they make a mistake" "Very few retail buyers have the true grading knowledge to buy higher value raw coins" However, I do think that there is a different culture when it comes to collecting in the USA and I (and others) have noted this when bidding at Heritage. In many cases, condition and grade are as important (more important?) as rarity. I highlighted an auction a couple of weeks ago where a 1887 withdrawn type sixpence - MS 65 I think - sold for $150 which is at least twice the value I would put on it and possible as much as three times what it would fetch at auction in the UK. On the other hand, I bought a lot which included an 1787 sixpence which was 'only' AU 55 for what I thought the sixpence was worth on its own. Both are common coins but the MS 65 commanded a huge premium and one which is, in my view, undeserving.